I think this is a Rorschach test. You can see what you want to see! There are HUNDREDS of shapes that occur in nature that you can see as phallic symbols if you want to. It is really NOT an uncommon shape!
Raptormann
Phalic symbols are definately in the eye of the beholder. Makes you wonder what is on their mind.
Raymond Hamlett
If the phalic symbol is in the eye of the beholder your doing it wrong.
Donn Irving
Oh my! that could make a youngern go blind.
Raymond Hamlett
True, dat, Don. True, dat.
Guest
Really? Is THAT how it works?
KGC
Careful there, you’ll poke your eye out.
Very Conservative
I just have to say that I only stumbled across this “article” today and I was curious to see what types of comments one could find on a piece such as this one. YOU have the only worthwhile comment I could find in the 1.5 minutes I spend reading. Slow clap for you my good man. Ha ha ha ha ha ha!!
MrLightRail
C’mon! Let’s try to find the hidden vaginas now!
psycho101
You’re right. This reminds me of an old psychology joke. The psychologist shows the patient a Rorschach image (ink blot) and asks the patient what he sees. “That’s a man and a woman on a bed about to have sex!” says the patient. He shows him another. “That’s a man and woman on a bed starting to have sex.” And another….”That’s a man and woman on a bed and they’re really going at it having sex.” The psychologist then tells the patient “I think you are obsessed with sex.” But, doctor” says the patient, “That’s not fair. You’re the one showing the dirty pictures.”
Betsy Warren
Haha, pretty much Rockhound in Armageddon.
ab
c’mon, it’s been a month, finish the joke
Melissa Leman
Exactly
yankee2
A LOT of people want to see penises.
Brian Blair
So a porno poster in “The Rescuers” is a Rorschach test?
podgida
not in that case, but the word sex written in the stars. I know what they are trying to point out and still can’t see it.
Oh and the G-string clad women in the lions face.. It is obvious whoever traced it, took some liberties and added a couple extra curves. Yes it’s close, but the person still changed it nonetheless.
Steve Blagg
maybe not, but The Rescuers was NOT a Disney film , it was from Don Bluth Studios, after Bluth left Disney (or got fired depending on who you believe.) So it shouldn’t be in this list anyway. The rest of this crap is just pure coincidence (or as has been stated before “I see what I want to see” BS.)
phantomspots
The Rescuers was indeed a Disney film. Don Bluth was a lead animator but it was produced by Disney before he left to start his own studio. Are you thinking of An American Tale, or Secret of NIMH?
vin b
The rescuers was a Disney film. Not only that, but knowledge of that scene was not even widely known to the general public until Disney themselves made a press release announcing the recall of the home video version of the film.
As it was only contained in 2 frames (and frames go by at 24 frames per second), the image was not visible in the theatrical release of the film.
It could only be found by knowing exactly where to pause or by using a frame by frame advance to find the image.
Disney’s position on the issue was that it had been added post production by the company that produced the film stock and not by any of its in-house animators.
The image had not been found until the home video release 20 years later because no one typically sits and looks at tens of thousands of frames in a film one frame at a time.
Steve Blagg
Gad, you’re both right, I was thinking of Secret of NIMH, Oh well I’m sure the Don Bluth films will be next on this ridiculous website’s target list
Halli620
It really is pathetic that a big deal was made about this. Not only does the poster shown seems to be of a topless variety, not anything so “explicit” as the article claims, but it’s supposed to be in a seedy part of town, where real children surely DO see posters like this all the time – yet pampered, cartoon-watching children are too delicate to see cartoon drawings as such for split-seconds in an admittedly meaningful way depicting a seedy area? Further, they pulled the whole MOVIE?? THAT’s what’s shameful. I hope no one sent theirs back for a sanitized version.
maquignon
I’ll bet you find pictures in potato chips too!
Rusty Varner
And tortillas. lol
Jennifer Blair
…or the face of Jesus in a pb&j sandwich.
Betsy Warren
Don’t forget toast.
androphiles
There’s not a single one of these I haven’t seen before. They had no news so they put this story up again.
Raymond Hamlett
Who is “they”?
androphiles
Whoever published this article. There’s no name showing as author, hence the anonymous pronoun.
Judy
I saw Baby Jesus™ in ever one o’ them pitchers! JESUSS!
observing57
Just shows you how “Hard Up” and uncreative the world is dementing into nowadays. This is how this administrations mind rambles through the day. Productive and oh how wholesome they are. Poor bastard’s and bitches.
Piltdown911
Imbeds.
Ramon1710 .
Not surprising that the sex stuff came during the twisted reign of Michael Eisner over Disney Corp(se), and after Walt Disney had passed on.
Cheryl Dymond
i can’t say about the DVD version, but when i was a video store manager one of my employees showed us this scene on the VHS and the dick grows and points forward as the scene progresses! that’s not about looking for phallic symbols!
JB Sellars1
caught that as well, as the sex in the stars seen that the 1st time i seen the movie and thats not seeing what each person sees it shows with stars SEX is in the shy.
K A Mears-Kolesnikoff Carter
Sorry not, I agree with “Twilight” the word in the stars is not there unless you draw the lines to make it. That “x” looks a little more like a “k” to me and I don’t really see the “E” at all even with the superimposed letter over it. I think the people here saying that it’s all the mind and people see what they want to see are right!
Nancy
Hillary Clinton is a lying, evil biatch. She has accomplished nothing and is a disaster in waiting for America…as if Obama hasn’t done enough damage. May she rot in hades.
Chet Cavanah
Oh Nancy, I’m worried about you. Your meds haven’t seemed to have reached theraputic levels. Please contact your primary care physician ASAP!!!
Dave Felt
how exactly has Obama done damage? Stock market at record highs, unemployment down the wars are over ….
Wanda Jones
Someone with sense…….there is hope…..
WandaAKAignorance
The shrub started the wars and spent billions supporting the cardiac kid’s Halliburton with no-bid contracts.
Tom Blech
IRAQ IN CHAOS—Oh wait you probably have a prius—-4 TRILLION IN PRINTED FAKE MONEY FROM THE FED—You really don’t look to far into the truth do you?
YourWifeIsMyLife
Someone’s off his meds again…
Ted Blewgent
Obama had to take us from the brink of economic catastrophe AND get us out of IRAQ. Oops, I forgot. Bobo Jr signed the Iraq withdrawal agreement…back in 2008!! That IDIOT! He better get back in his “MISSION ACCOMPLISHED” plane, fly the fugk back over there and fix HIS MESS!!
tammy
Obama’s mess. He should have left a contingency group there. He didn’t work out an agreement with Iraq, now all our boys deaths and injuries are for nothing. Now with ISIS in charge, it is worse than before. Thank you, President too busy partying to care.
Ned Farn
hey davey you should read the news sometime–man the dems love idiots like you-must be a teacher
Lc Goodfellow
If you’re hungry enough, road kill will make for a king’s feast. Liberals were so hungry for someone like Obama, he seemed like so much more than he really was. Or is!
The first is the most important.
1) Healthcare – Control healthcare and you control the people.
- Remember when Nancy Pelosi said: “We have to pass it, to find out what’s in it”
A physician called into a radio show and said: “That’s the definition of a stool sample”.
2) Poverty – Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.
- You can’t make the rich poorer without making the poor, poorer.
- “Gas prices have increased 200% since Obama’s election”, “Obama failing on jobs; unemployment still above 6.5% after 6 years
Obama is dead-set on granting amnesty to millions of illegals.
3) Debt – Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty.
- The national debt has gone up 60 % during President Obama’s first term. The national debt is $ 17.4 trillion and Obama is responsible for almost $ 6 trillion in 3.5 years.
Obamacare, and Big Government – and the higher taxes that will come with it. The rich will clearly be paying more, along with everyone else.
4) Gun Control – Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state.
5) Welfare – Take control of every aspect of their lives (Food, Housing, and Income)
6) Education – Take control of what people read and listen to – take control of what children learn in school.
- It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.
7) Religion – Remove the belief in God from the Government and schools
8) Class Warfare – Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor.
This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take (Tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.
- The Census Bureau defines poverty for a family of four as earning $23,550 or less.
- “Today the nations of the world may be divided into two classes – the nations in which the government fears the people, and the nations in which the people fear the government.”
After watching a documentary about the tragic story of Jonestown, I was struck by the utterly unthinking way that so many people put themselves completely at the mercy of a glib and warped man, who led them to degradation and destruction. And I could not help thinking of the parallel with the way we put a glib and warped man in the White House.
Ted Blewgent
LMAO @ these LUNATIC fear mongers! Yup, IRAQ IN CHAOS! WHO OPENED THAT CAN OF WORMS?? Here’s a thought, let IRAQ clean up IRAQ. 5,000 of ours died over there, under bobo jr.
“Mission Accomplished”….ring a bell…moron???
Lc Goodfellow
“Blewgent” is that code for something ?????
“In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members … It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons.”
– Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002
Pull on that !
“I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force — if necessary — to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security.”
– Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002
Bad intel ? You’ve never been there so STFU !
Ted Blewgent
Nah. How about you “STFU”. Creep. You must be a child…because every adult knows that the administration COOKED those stories…to justify the rush to war. Turn off FUX news.
Phil
“the administration cooked those stories” Man, you’re some kind of SPECIAL stupid, aren’t you?
tammy
You need to turn on Fox news. The other news stations are owned by Democrats and you either get out and out lies (MSNBC) or half truths. Fox leans right, but they give both sides. You are only hearing the news straight from the propaganda government channels. You are the child, believing what they tell you over what you see. Also, ISSA has found many of those stocks of WMD’s and we watched many trucks of gas going across the Syrian border before the war, with verification of what leaked from those trucks. Also, as above, the Dems demanded that war. Hillary, in one of her emails to GB said, if he refused, he would never get anything he wanted from either house. She was the front for the Dems who forced the war. If GB was like BO, he would have stood up and put the blame on the Dems, He didn’t because he was President and believed the buck stopped there. Obama believes the buck stops anywhere but with him. He only knows what he read in the papers. Obviously he needs to stop fund raising, vacationing, golfing and partying and attend some meeting
YourWifeIsMyLife
Keep drinking the kool aid, dear. You’re spinning a fantastic story. What an imagination!
tammy
Youre the kool aid drinker, I stick to TEA. Kool aid rots the brain. Have a good day
YourWifeIsMyLife
Maggots rot the brain too, dear, so get back on your meds before there’s nothing left.
Tra-la.
tammy
At least you have a sense of humor. I think you are deluded, you think I am. OK, we can agree to disagree
tammy
Sorry, there, but the Dems were in control of both houses on 9-11. They demanded to go to war. The blame should go where it belongs, on the Dems. Read the released emails and memo’s from GB years and you will see who was responsible for demanding the war in Iraq…the Dems. GB takes the blame because he was President, something BO should learn to do. He never takes blame for anything, even when it is his own fault, he finds someone else to take the blame. I’m 63 years old and have never seen such a corrupt government. I have always voted for the man, not the party. But now the Dems have ousted God, become socialist and are following Sal Alinski, they are now too anti American for me. Republicans are too much like Dems? Now were to go???
Craig
Let me tell you where to go.
tammy
Sorry, hell is full of Dems, it would be too scary
Craig, read the Bush years memos, emails and notes. The Dems demanded to go to war, Hillary the worse. The Dems had the same info that Bush and Cheney had. Not only our intelligence but the intelligence from all other countries said the same thing. BTW, ISIS knew where there were catches of WMD in Iraq, or did you miss that little bit of information. Also there was and is proof that much of the WMD went across the border to Syria. We had proof of that also, another fact you missed? The house and Senate demanded that war, Bush went along, which makes him just as guilty, but he took all the blame. And seriously you are not stupid enough to believe anything the Muslim run UN has to say? You are really not that stupid are you?
Craig
The UN is not a Muslim organization. Based in NY, it is a world wide organization with branches in The Haig, Geneva, and Kuala. I won’t ask you where you get your news. It’s evident.
The chemical weapons you are referring to were removed from Iraq by the UN in 1990-1991.
The Dems did grant power to Bush to go to war, but the power granted was too broad. Joe Biden said this in 2002. Cheney took advantage of the new found power and ran with it. Bush wasn’t smart enough to speak for himself.
“”Bush later said that the biggest regret of his presidency was “the intelligence failure” in Iraq, while the Senate Intelligence Committee found in 2008 that his administration “misrepresented the intelligence and the threat from Iraq”. A key CIA informant in Iraq admitted that he lied about his allegations, “then watched in shock as it was used to justify the war”.””
ISIS is a terrorist organization. Like the Bush administration, they rely on lies and fear to get what they want. Since you trust them I will let that slide.
tammy
You are so delusional. I told you the truth, but stay in your ignorance, it is a nice soft comfortable place.
Phil
You really shouldn’t confuse the dems with actual facts. Oh, I guess it’s all right….they won’t understand anyway.
Lc Goodfellow
Thx !
Christa Rose Errigo
Wow. You are absolutely delusional, a lonely, ignorant waste of space.
Lc Goodfellow
The more educated you are, the harder it is to see the simple truths that are staring you in the face.
Take your 15 post and go sit in the corner.
tammy
You have done a good job in outlining his worse atrocities. But the Bo people will never recognize the truth until it comes to their door step. They are like the people in the left behind series who watched the anti=Christ murder that man in front of their eyes. The anti-Christ said the man committed suicide and they all parroted it and swore they saw the man commit suicide. I’m sure many of these people could watch BO destroying our country and mime back that he is doing such a good job, while they are starving. They’d probably still blame Bush
Ted Blewgent
Shhh Dave, they don’t allow such truth to be told over in the land of FUX news. Haven’t you heard? America is on life support.
William laFrance
Ted, you’ve got you head stuck so far up obama’s ass that you wouldn’t know the truth if it bit you on the ass. You’ve listened to obama’s lies and his media’s lies so long that you don’t know anything but lies.
rjproskey
liberal dimwits like blewobama are good for the rest of us; they kick us up a few notches when it comes to common sense and thinking for oneself. three cheers for the 1st and 2nd amendment. bring back the death penalty. close the borders. just love to pull their chains
russellbennett
Obama tells his base what they want to hear then does what he wants to do and the Media does not report what he does.
tammy
Between Soros and BO’s backers, they have bought up most news outlets. We now only have government sanctioned news except Fox. They only go so far in reporting too, in that they mostly back off and don’t really say what it is, except for a few occasionally. You can’t believe what the news reports, we now need a “free America” news for America. Soros, Kissinger have given interviews in 2008 explaining exactly why they put Obama in as the President and what he was to accomplish. So far, he is right on time. As far as the stock market goes, Soros (BO’s buddy and the 17th wealthiest man in the world) says he only has to make one phone call and we are bankrupt. He is waiting for the right time. He outlined exactly how he would do it and he is on the last step. He invested heavily about 4 months ago in futures, betting the US economy will fail. He said he will make trillions when he destroys us. That man is totally evil. Don’t forget he visits the WH more than any other visitor. I know those who love Obama will not believe a word, but maybe they will remember this one thing, Kissinger said, if BO destroys our economy, they will make him the first One World President. Guess we will see
JB Sellars1
92 million out of work unemployment is really much much higher when your benifits run out and you are not working they count that as less UE. keepdrinking the fool aid. Dave should i start about the damage he has done to this great nation, yeay the rich got ricker whoopie.
tammy
Only Obama’s backers.
William laFrance
Just like a democrap, only believe what his leader tells him, never research anything for himself. Research can help with your Stupidity.
Rusty Varner
The wars are not over Dave. We still have people in Afghanistan, LIbya, and Iraq. Obama is fixing to send more troops into Iraq. Yes, the stock market is high and I am happy about that. On the unemployment it is down in many places and up in places like Texas.
As for what damage Obama has done; read what is going on at our southern border because of the administration’s failure to enforce the immigration laws we already have on the books….now he wants 2 billion to “fix” the problem he and the DOJ caused. He is also inadverdantly lining the pockets of human traffickers.
Alex Mewes
Are you retarded, dude? LOL – the war in Afghanistan is still going on…we still have soldiers dying over there. We have soldiers pledged to fight in four or five different foreign nations right now – are you REALLY that ignorant to your own countries’ military, dude? Jesus.
Read a book, dude, lmfao. Unemployment down? Where…? Federally? Yet we still contain one of the highest unemployment rates in the Western world? OK, BRO.
David Taylor
how does this relate to the article ???? …. and btw, you should seek some kind of help for your delusions
Robert Oppenheimer
My dad can get an olive out of the bottom of the jar with only his little finger!
Craig
I want your dad’s little finger.
Phil
Agree Nancy’s post is out of place concerning this article. Delusional…not so much. Spot on, actually.
YourWifeIsMyLife
Don’t jump the gun again; remember 2008? While the right wing morons were busy piling on Hillary, Obama waltzed right past them and into the White House.
Tom Blech
That statement only proves that this world is a toilet run by evil people who victimize and exploit others to succeed and enjoy spreading misery and condemnation—like your above statement. Sooo, you only proved that evil like you is successful in this commode you call a “world”—good job.
YourWifeIsMyLife
I proved the triumph and viability of evil, misery and exploitation on earth? With my li’l ol’ post?
AWESOME!!!!
tammy
Yes you did. While they are throwing Hillary at everyone, Obama is backing that biatch who stole her education from a native American by pretending she was part indian. I’ll bet they are throwing Hillary to the wolves to keep everyones eyes on her while they are backing the biatch. I say biatch because we know she is a thief and liar. Oh sorry got off the topic. Back to Disney
K A Mears-Kolesnikoff Carter
?? I know this is off the article discussion, but I thought Hillary was the biatch. Please name the person you are talking about.
joesolis
All true, but what does that have to do with this article?
http://www.horrorboom.com/ D.D.
You got all that out of this article?
rjproskey
it was a subliminal message
Trakdog90
Was that in the picture?!?!?!
Stephen Ryan
“Hades” is spelled with a capital H.
Keith
What does Hillary being a lying evil biatch have to do with this article?
Craig
Nancy, bottom bitch. Fcku off and die.
tammy
You must be a liberal, They are the only ones that use that kind of language.
Craig
Tammy, since you are a conservative, female, tea partier; I shall only have to say this once. Shut Up!
tammy
You are such a gentleman. At least your language is better.
Christa Rose Errigo
What the bloody hell are you even talking about? Sick. Seek help.
Raymond Hamlett
I am not worried about you, Nancy. And, oh yeah, you’re a sick cunt.
tammy
Another liberal???
tammy
Nancy, I think you are on the wrong comment page. This is about Disney movies. Otherwise, you are right on LOL
David Len Allen
What the HEY?! We’re talking about Disney films, not political editorial cartoons!
Oak Tree Lady
Except for the 3 pigs and the priest in the wedding, all the rest are in the minds of the viewers. Just have fun and let your mind wander and you will see lots of images and symbols! It’s why it’s called “movie magic.”
coinage
The wedding was the priests knee. It flexes.
John Beam
coinage is right. People believing that they saw an “erection” weren’t paying attention what the priest was doing. He shifts his weight, and it causes one of the knees to bend and push out. It is connected to his FOOT, for crying out loud.
Nancy Robb
There is no need to struggle seeing “hidden” junk in Disney movies. Why are the crows in “Dumbo” black? Do you really think Pocahantas really zipped through the forest in her scanties? Most Disney cartoon females are similarly (un)dressed. And don’t get me started on the ‘happy’ slaves in “Song of the South”.
Criddic
The movie of “Song of the South” was supposed to take place after the Civil War, when there were no slaves, but it has confused viewers for decades because there is no specific mention of the time.
Brett
Why are the crows black? Umm, because crows are… guess what? BLACK.
Bruce
umm, its the dialect they are using. Pay attention when you watch the movie.
Brett
What do you mean?
Bruce
The crows are speaking in a “black” dialect common to African-Americans in the South in this time period. So its like a pun: black crows talking like Southern Blacks.
Brett
Okay, I get it now. Why is that racist, however? It’s just a logical form of personification. I’m sure if the crows were talking in the Queen’s English, there would be someone out there declaring it racist because the crows are “Black.”
Bruce
Some people think it is racist if you suggest that people of different racial or ethnic makeup “sound” different. I remember watching the OJ Simpson trial and at one point a witness said the voice he heard in the alley “sounded Black”. Defense Attorney John Cochran jumped up and the statement was “racist”. I don’t agree with the comment, but many people believe this.
Stephen Ryan
Crows are black. That’s the way it is. Polar bears are white. They can’t help it.
rjproskey
i liked the crows in song of the south.
John Beam
*SIGH* The little priest in The Little Mermaid is NOT having an erection!!! This is the stupidest urban legend I’ve ever seen. It’s gone on so badly that it caused Disney to “censor” this scene, by REMOVING THE GUY’S LEGS. NOTHING IS CONNECTED TO HIS FEET ANYMORE!!!
The “bulge down there” is the little guy’s KNEE. If you watch his whole actions, he shifts his weight on one side, and it causes one knee to bend. IT IS CONNECTED TO HIS FOOT, for crying out loud!
John Beam
The short scene in The Rescuers where there’s a couple of frames of a topless woman is real, but so much of this is urban legend and idiocy. There is so much JUNK in Disney movies that are up-front and not at all covert, and to make issues about imagined stuff is retarded.
Wanda Jones
This is an actual discussion? OMG……
Shirley Crowfoot
Me thinks smut much like beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I do admit that the artists may have been competing to see which one could make the most egregious “error”.As far as “The Three Little Pigs” photo of their father goes, I think that is pretty funny.
puzzlelady
All that hidden stuff is hokey. People can see smut in anything. What has always bothered me about the 3 little pigs is that the clever pig wears overalls but the other two have bare bottoms. What’s with that?
cd53
An article that would appeal to any ten year old. And, a ten year old probably wrote it.
For the third frame, that isn’t Ariel… it’s Ursula in disguise. A scene like this one wasn’t in the film featuring Ariel.
Twilight
“Phallic palace”? Like faces of Jesus and forms of the Virgin Mary, phallus can be seen EVERYWHERE, if you are looking for them.
tammy
So true, this is a stupid article, obviously written by a pre-teen
Twilight
Someone has a dirty mind. Try looking at a real lion, and you’ll see pretty much the same thing.
Twilight
They only cut it because of dirty minded pervs like the author of this nonsense.
Twilight
I think the “SEX” in the stars could just as easily read “SEARS.” Creating a problem where none exists.
Echo Moon
i think that who ever is seeing all this shit in all these movies has some serious mental problems…. they are sick with perverted delusions?… perverted hopeful imaginings?… whatever the F it is they are suffering from, they are some sick perverted slimes…..
Raymond Hamlett
Or… maybe you are the sick one… hmmm.
tammy
I won’t go as far as saying they are sick, but I agree with you in that they have a very sexual imagination. Even when pointed out, it was not easily seen. The one they said, said sex, I saw movie. I guess it depends on whose imagination you are going by
Sarah
Number 9. The 3 little pigs and the fate of their father. This cartoon is so old, that it was actually made in the time when cartoons were made for adults, not kids. It’s true that children enjoy cartoons, but in a cinematic time when people went to the theatres is watch news reels, cartoons and feature length movies, these cartoons were made for adult entertainment. In light of that, this is still dark humor, but its humor directed at the over 18 viewing audience. Another version of this particular cartoon was used to promote the sale of war bonds during WWII, and the wolf in the cartoon bore a swastika arm band and the bricks of the 3rd little pig’s home had “Made in USA” stamped on them.
Lynn Yancosky
Cartoons for the most part have always had elements that were geared towards adults. Do you think all kids (any under 12, maybe) would understand the sarcasm, irony and historical or cultural references in a Bugs Bunny or Bullwinkle cartoon? How about the Simpsons?
Sarah
Lynn, you’re right, The Simpsons was never intended to be a “kids” cartoon; nor were most of the early shorts, including Bugs Bunny and Bullwinkle.. Yet the article clearly states, and somehow you missed the comment in the article, that this is dark humor for a kid’s cartoon. It’s not a kid’s cartoon. Unlike the Little Mermaid, Hercules and basically every other mention in the article, this one, while still a somewhat sadistic joke, was never written for children. In the same way that many Disney shorts are now condemned for the violence towards animals, references to drinking and smoking and sex, this one has been misinterpreted as a “kids” cartoon and “inappropriate.” This and many other early cartoons do not have content “geared toward adults;” the entire cartoon was written for adults, that is the point of my comment above.
Bruce
Sarah, Lynn is actually supporting your position. I think you read her post just a little too fast.
Sarah
Bruce, if you re-read Lynn’s comment, she asked a question and I replied to clarify what was misunderstood about my original comment. If you want to get into semantics, she specifically asked a very pointed question with the intent to belittle the relevance of my comment. Her note failed to recognize the point of my comment which is evident in her comment that cartoons have ‘elements geared toward adults’ which was actually completely irrelevant to my comment that this cartoon was entirely written for adults. I attempted to rectify this misunderstanding by reiterating that the cartoon in question is not a kids cartoon with adult undertones but an adult cartoon which has been mis-categorized as a kids cartoon in the original article. I think perhap we have different definitions of the word supporting, but thanks just the same for the note
Bobby Whyaskin
Listen closely to some of what Popeye mutters in those cartoons. A lot of political commentary happening there. It’s pretty hilarious.
Amindele
Yes.
(But only some)
Halli620
I don’t necessarily agree that this cartoon in particular was more geared toward adults, nor the “joke” of the picture, but I also don’t see how it’s anything more than a crack that most (at least older) children WILL get, as they should, if they know where food and meat actually comes from, as they also should know.
Ken Follette
the typos, they burn!!! get a bleeding editor.
Mic
Personally, on several of these, I think that dirty minded adults have WAY too much time on their hands. Imho.
Gregory Wahl
The pigs one actually has multiple pictures of “Father” on the wall. Near the piano there’s the sausage pic, but in the far right corner there’s a full-on plated ham. Weirdly enough, there’s another framed pic in their house– of a banana split.
Amindele
People are looking WAAAAAY too hard.
Rusty Varner
No pun intended, I assume? lol.
Raymond Hamlett
LOL…
tammy
OK you won the comment of the day LOL
Trakdog90
Just before lunch time I see the the words “Cheese Burger” in the clouds…
Kevin Hill
First one, and already BS. The phallus on the castle isn;t even in the movie. It was on the first versions of the VHS tape covers, and was done by an outside company. It’s quite apparent this image isn’t a scene from the film.
MisterManReturns
Rehashed garbage gossip. How many times are teen reporters on the Internet going to bring this up?
EllenRipley112
That’s not Ariel in “The Little Mermaid” wedding photo–that’s Ursula in disguise so Ariel CAN’T marry the prince and break the curse. Ariel gets married at the end, and we never see the priest, she’s got a totally different dress, and it’s a beautiful sunny day with blue skies. Watch a movie before commenting on it, people.
EllenRipley112
*sigh* and Zeus did NOT create the demi-God Hercules out of clouds. He made Pegasus like that (even though that’s totally against Greek canon, that’s neither here nor there). Seriously, do you people need an editor to catch these mistakes before they make it to print? ‘Cause I do freelancing…
Hunk of Love
Underpaid, disgruntled artists working for greedy, heartless media conglomerates will get you every time.
Keldon McFarland
Not this dumb $#!t again!
Craig Chilton
On #10 — The “flash dancers” — I see NOTHING of the kind in that screen-capture!
What kind of damaged paranoid repressed mind worries about any of this K Rap?
I couldn’t find any truth to any of the screen shots. If you believe any of this, just think of the horror of exposing your children to Produce Department at your local supermarket.
Rocknrobyn
You got that right Wally. Good dog!
JB Sellars1
then why did you read it
Linda B. Williams
congratulations on what has to be one of the stupidest comments ever written. think about it… I sooooo hope you were kidding.
JosefineAnne
Wouldn’t know it was stupid unless you read it, stupid!
http://www.hashhoward.com/ Alex Howard
Why is it so important to all of you, to insult another person online?
What’s spoken is in the air; what’s written is always there.
Now, anybody can see that – at least once – you were an online bully. I suggest that if you don’t like people doing this to you, you might consider not doing it again next time.
stampece
Lighten up, you pompous windbag. It’s an idiotic piece on a purely frivolous website. Her comment wasn’t bigoted or profane. If someone jumps into online comments on a website like this and throws around strong adjectives, they can expect equally colorful responses. Kids are being blown to bits in Gaza. Take your desire for a kinder gentler world to that issue and stop wasting your self-righteousness trying to shame people for goofing around on some idiotic Disney hidden message junk on an idiotic website.
TED
“kids are being bolwn to bits in Gaza”
Nice observation.
They need to make damn sure they get all the murderous adults as well.
EcoAdvocate
from the Israeli Offense Force, yes. End the Illegal Occupation, #FreePalestine !
TED
What you are really saying is kill the Jews. The Palestinian charter calls for the destruction of Israel. That makes you an anti-Semite and no different than Hitler. Bet your momma is proud of the scum she has raised.Terrorist.
MrLightRail
Never.EVER was a state of Palestine.
JasinWalraven
#LevelPalestine #BombPalestine
me2
#NukeHamas
Philip Rowe
…says the online police.
YourWifeIsMyLife
You’re quite they ray of sunshine aren’t you?
Regards-
YWIML
Charmaine Jackson
Talk about lightening up. Jesus, it seems like your head is spinning. hahahaha. Oh, and while over in Gaza, kids’ heads are being blown away…in America we’re doing the ice bucket challenge!!! What’s your point???
Linda B. Williams
*I* didn’t insult **him**: *I* accurately described his comment.
There is a difference. THINK about it, rather than having a knee-jerk emotional response to something that never happened.
Which is another description of a comment, and a suggestion about your behavior, neither of which is an “insult” or “bullying.”
If you don’t understand the difference… just let me know, and I’ll explain it to you.
Dorothy Reading
You called him stupid (I’m assuming you’re the same person as JosefineAnne?). That was not a description of his comment, but a description of how you perceived him. Insult. Bully.
Linda B. Williams
“one of the stupidest comments”
That was not a description of his comment, but a description of how you perceived him = FAIL.
Reading for information — you missed that day in school, didn’t you?
Given that you think I am also JosefineAnne, I’m betting you also missed the day they taught logical thinking.
But, by all means, PLEASE continue offering your profound grammatical insights and scintillating comments. I know I, for one, have been enormously enriched by your remarks!!
Dorothy Reading
If you’d rather not be seen as a bully (which I’m assuming you don’t because you’re reacting vehemently against the accusation), you should probably not use demeaning language as a way of trying to prove your points. I made a mistake in thinking you were JosefineAnne because JosefineAnne was who Alex Howard directly responded to. Seemed like a logical assumption, all things considered. My comment, other than being directed at the wrong person, was otherwise accurate.
Linda B. Williams
“My comment, other than being directed at the wrong person, was otherwise accurate.”
No, it wasn’t. Neither is most of this one.
Dorothy Reading
*sigh* “Wouldn’t know it was stupid unless you read it, stupid!” was JosefineAnne’s comment. If you’ll note the comma near the end of the sentence, it indicates that “stupid” is whom she’s speaking to. Therefore, my comment, “You called him stupid. . . . That was not a description of his comment, but a description of how you perceived him. Insult. Bully,” was accurate. And my second comment was entirely accurate, seeing as it was mostly opinion.
Linda B. Williams
“And my second comment was entirely accurate”
*sigh* Except that you accused me of doing something *I* didn’t do, and you KNOW **I** didn’t do…
I clearly posted that was “one of the stupidest COMMENTS”
JosefineAnne called the guy stupid. I’m not JosefineAnne. *I* didn’t call a PERSON “stupid”.
*sigh*…. What’s really pathetic is, even as you are EXPLAINING to me what you meant, you fail to see that you accused **me** of behavior you know JosefineAnne did.
Dorothy Reading
Like I’ve stated implicitly, I was talking about JosefineAnne. I hadn’t even read your previous comment and wonder why you commented on Alex Howard at all if you didn’t feel you in some way warranted the accusation. And yes, I accused you of belittling behavior in my second comment because of your comment to me. You should read back through your comments and try to see them from an outsiders perspective. This really could have been prevented if you had said simply, “I’m not her.” Then I would have recognized my mistake, apologized, and moved on. You chose to respond the way you did.
Linda B. Williams
Yeah – I expected some kind of comment like this: you insist that * YOUR* extreme and horrific failure to understand my comments was **my** fault.
How desperate and pathetic… *sigh* And THEN to insist that If I had simply said, “I’m not JosefineAnne” you would have miraculously become a morally Good person and APOLOGIZED.
Except, for the glaringly obvious evidence that you didn’t -ever…. even though I DID say, clearly, that I am not JosefineAnne…
there is no amount of eye rolling at your statement that can be conveyed through words…
You think about as competently as Kristen Stewart acts. Let’s see if you can figure out what THAT means.
Dorothy Reading
You really need help. Either you’re a troll, in which case good on you. You got me. Or you’ve actually deluded yourself into thinking your overreactions make any sense. Reread your comments. Seriously. That’s the only advice I can give you. God bless.
Linda B. Williams
My comments are not “overreactions”. In fact, if I told you that you are a self-righteous, arrogant, obtuse harridan that would be an UNDER reaction, based on the level of intellectual incompetence and moral turpitude you have demonstrated .
Of course, simply saying ‘you are a troll’ is much shorter, and doesn’t require much of a vocabulary.
Isn’t it funny how **you** have incorporated the conveniently vague terms “overreactions” and “troll” so easily… just ‘slipped’ them into a conversation about how it’s bullying to call someone ‘stupid’??
Which also makes you a hypocrite.
Charmaine Jackson
It’s being ignorant and lacking the ability of being socially civil. It somehow makes some people feel good about themselves to belittle othets. It’s completely uncalled for. Also, this simply humorous article has gotten people all worked up.
GJI
Nice. You’re a real credit to society lady.
Some Guy
Congratulations on understanding how reading works … ? ….
Artie412
He read it for the same reason I did: the promise of the headline. It was a lie, and we feel like fools for getting suckered in.
JB Sellars1
and how far did you get reading it.
Artie412
I kept waiting for SOME value. I guess you’re a lot smarter than me if you avoided reading it.
daveb58
Why do you care? Do you think this was a funny, revealing, useful or even amusing story?
Jenn
~The Truth Of Life In 3 Pages~
Google “TruthContest” and click on “The Present”.
David Len Allen
Well you don’t really know how stupid it is until you get finished with it! And the reason you keep going is the hope that a zinger or two will really pop out at you. And then you realize it’s like a bad Peggy Lee song: Is that all there is?
Rick
”stupid is as stupid does”
daveb58
Shouldn’t have. Waste of time. A ridiculous article. Tells you more about the author than anything else.
K A Mears-Kolesnikoff Carter
Totally agree and now I won’t go beyond picture number 5.
GJI
Because it sounded like a fun article, a$$hole. And then we all felt like suckers because it turned out to be the stupidest article with the dumbest crap ever. So go fock yourself.
JB Sellars1
FUK you too A$$ hole
RD
For evidence with which justly to attack the creep who wrote it.
Lancer69
Oh Brother. Really?
Festus Hagen
someone with way too much time on their hands
Diane
Some of this was really a stretch….. Even after reading what they see, I could not tell on most of them.
Bruce
Many of these “discoveries” came from a single person who was functioning as a Christian Watch group. Christians turned on Disney when the company extended benefits to their homosexual employees and their partners. First the Southern Baptists called for a boycott, and then, well the rest is history.
Dianne Clanton
Somebody’s really stretching for these.
Kayla McCormick
just saying… but in the lion king.. it says Hippo,- then fades, then appears sex right after. so it says hippo sex… also in Aladdin, he actually says… good teenagers, take off your clothes
Zach Shedd
THIS IS DUMB AS SHIT…
ohyeah
wtf did I just read?????
dirtydog1776
Too many people with too much time. Hey people with no lives…….read to the blind, help a senior citizen, mentor a young person……..do something useful.
Lesa Brackbill
Most of these aren’t news at all – I remember finding the Little Mermaid, Lion King, and Aladdin ones in middle school (late 90s)…and they actually forgot one of the Lion King ones.
http://atlantarofters.blogspot.com/ The Sanity Inspector
It’s a shame that these artists had so little respect for their audience. They should just quit and go draw for Heavy Metal magazine or something.
Carol Parker
Some people just have too much time on heir hands.
Guest
Disney, DISNEY? Geeze, go over to Warner Bros, dude, you won’t have enough space to write about it. So what? Get a life.
jim
Thats stupid,and serious wood please, its so small it could be a pimple
2 manycritters
Like Freud said, “Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar”. Get a life.
vlad tepes
my 3year old son did noticed , and he ask me , dad how many homosexual was in the beginning? and I did not know what to tell him, but I recover quick and I ask him , what beginning ? of America , of islam , or the end?
David Rosenfield
This article is totally false. Hercules isn’t anyone’s favorite Disney movie.
Bruce
I know at least one person who likes Hercules, so your statement is falsified.
Anyone’s? So sure of yourself.
I certainly like it, as do both of my daughters. One grown and out of the house, the other 1/2 way there. Top 5 Disney in our minds
Killary Clottin’
Disney pushes the queer agenda.
MJ Comus
And that’s bad because…?
Killary Clottin’
Homosexual pairing is a biological dead end which destroys human genetic diversity.
That’s why it has been correctly labeled as a mental disorder for hundreds of years.
MJ Comus
Seems to me the gene pool is doing quite fine with 85% of the population still pumping out babies and diversifying their DNA. What about straight people who don’t get married or make babies? Aren’t they doing just as much damage to ‘genetic diversity’ as teh gays?
Killary Clottin’
Homosexual pairing destroys all the genetic biodiversity that is created at meiosis.
Darwin Called homosexual pairing an inferior behavior FOR A REASON
MJ Comus
I repeat – don’t straights who don’t make babies do the same thing: remove their DNA from the gene pool? Don’t they also “destroys all the genetic biodiversity that is created at meiosis”? So why are gays worse than childless heterosexuals?
As for Darwin, “inferior” is an opinion, not a scientific fact. Besides he died 131 YEARS AGO; things have moved along since then.
C’mon, grow up and join us here in the 21st century; you probably know a few gays without realizing it, gays who are hiding in the closet because of people with opinions like yours.
MJ Comus
Just what exactly is “the queer agenda,” btw?
Gen. Black Jack Pershing
Sorry, but the porn was pulled as soon as the public realized what Disney was up to.
7. The Rescuers and the…oh, they didn’t, did they?past a poster advertising porn. Full-on, explicit porn. The movie was
pulled as soon as Disney realized what their animators had been up to,
Disney is all sorcery, witches, spell casting, and rebellion, and anyone who allows children to watch Disney is asking for children who rebel.
Disney wrote Walt Disney with three 6s forward and three 6s backward in his name.
Rusty Varner
From the World English Dictionary: pareidolia (noun) the imagined perception of a pattern or meaning where it does not actually exist.
and now disney is openly gay … who is surprised at the behavior of gay folks they are the dirtiest ones at the party!!!
twoedgedsword
You got this much time on your hands to make crap out of nothing, how about make something useful. Sheesh.
GuateNY
This website sucks @$$. Çunts.
F M
Disney is a company. It’s a singular noun. So stop writing as if it were plural. It should be “Disney was”, not “Disney were”.
There’s so much bad grammar these days. Sorry for bringing up my pet peeve.
ejljr
Everyone can see something different. I think some of these are just the work of people with less important things to do. And why bring this to the attention of others? Kids will naturally search to see it. I have a high aptitude for in abstract reasoning. I can see things in a picture or graphic that 90% of other people can’t see. I have tried at time to show people but they can’t see it. So, I just don’t bother telling others. So you can see it, so what! Don’t make a stupid issue out of it like in this article!
Buk Lau
well talk about a poorly researched article. the phallus on the mermaid castle was on the original box art of the film, not a frame in the movie. disney released the film with new art and posters, etc. to cover up for the controversy. i know because i had a poster and clamshell vhs when i was a kid and the art for each was different because the poster came after. same design of ariel and eric with triton, the castle and ursula in the background but it was drawn differently so kids weren’t hanging giant dick castles on their walls.
omg and you couldn’t even get the right frame of the “priest boner” during the wedding scene? this is the worst.
Toby Belch
Jesus H Christ, I couldn’t even make this out until I Googled it. If you’re going to TIT-ilate us with supposed Disney outrages you could at least show a pair of animation boobs without putting a fucking black bar across them. None of this stuff rates outrage, anyway, unless you’re a blue-nosed Southern Baptist.
tammy
This stuff comes from someones dirty mind, so doubt even Southern Baptists would see anything wrong with Disney Cartoons
Sa Say
Most of this is just a stretch…to say the least. Trying to make something out of nothing.
Kelly Hamilton
Oh, you naughty children, seeing naughty things in Disney cartoons! Disney cartoonists are the best in the business and could do much better if they really wanted to hide penises in their art. Sorry, but all these images are in your fevered imaginations. The fanciful notion of the “bored animators” is a juvenile fabrication. And why are the pictures so blurry? If your aim is to point out subtle, hidden details, you need a better resolution than these pathetic examples. Somebody has way too much time on their hands.
coolstang
In the Little Mermaid, my Nephew showed me a section of the Video where you pause it and then advance it Frame by Frame and the King gets an erection. You don’t see it at normal speed.
Auntie Sober
whoever wrote this needs to get laid, desperately
ra44mr2
NOW i know why i like the Rescuers so much as a kid. :p
Lc Goodfellow
Aaaah dog poo on all your shoes
lakawak
10 things we never noticed, mostly because most, if not all of them didn’t exist
Gary Warren
Who would be stupid enough, bored enough, or gullible enough, to read this stupid piece of trash?”
Truthteller1952
The only people seeing the so-called ‘smut’ are the ones with the dirtiest minds — they see sex wherever they want, then complain because it doesn’t fit thier narrow mindset of ‘how things are supposed to be’.
Joy Sreta
IT is well known that Walt Disney was a sick, racist, freaky individual. The entire Disney corporation is slimy, and this is a reflection of it
Bruce
I didn’t know it…you have any proof, references, citations, or do you just work the rumor mill?
Therese Pankey
Amen, Bruce.
Katie Wemhoff
I never heard Aladdin saying “take off your clothes” in the balcony scene even though others insisted. I always thought he was saying “Down kitty… take off now, go!”
Phil; Reid Sr.
Someone has way too much free time for their sick mind.
John Taylor
It is all in the imagination of the individual.
matt
these are all crap
Smart doofus
How very imaginative!
You know that there are Americans who actually believe that the Republican Party still has intelligent leaders. There are persons that think Rush Limbaugh is NOT a big piece of crrap who spews idiotic nonsense.
Therese Pankey
LOL! How true! These, we know, are the ones who live in fantasy land. They also believe there is no hunger, racism, discrimination, sexual harassment or rape that is NOT caused by the person it is happening to.
Ken Anderson
“10 things never noticed…” And I still have not noticed them because you have shown me nothing! If you’re going to say something was said, THEN PLAY THE AUDIO!. If you’re going to say something was shown, THEN SHOW ME THE PICTURE!. Ridiculous.
anne
Well, I will never get that time back…..what a waste.
Bruce
Its hysterical that you then take another two minutes to post that.
anne
seconds, Bruce..just seconds. lol Also, allowed to post MY OPINION! HAVE A GREAT DAY….
Jiyu
These myths are really tiresome and have been refuted many times over the years. If you look at the frame in question in the Lion King, for example, (look at it on your own copy, not the doctored still in this story), the letters formed in the stars are clearly “SFX” not “SEX”. SFX is movie shorthand for “special effects,” and was nothing more than a little self-aggrandizement by some overenthusiastic effects artists. Sheesh, get your minds out of the gutter, people!
Dom5157
If it was on purpose that is very very hidden, so what did you do to find that? Search through the film to find dirty hidden pictures or something?
Diana Petersen
I think to many people have filth on the mind and go to great lengths to find it in everything. Maybe the bible thumpers among us have gotten bored just complaining about video games. And the dark humor – the 3 pigs. Cartoons used to be shown between movies or before the feature film. Cartoons were often made to entertain both the child and the parent. Done very well. The kids would never notice but the parents who did would get a bit of a chuckle.
mitch
The Little Mermaid “wedding scene” one even showed up on 60 Minutes many years ago. This is very common in the “entertainment” industry. You even see these in advertising, like in the butter logo that shows the indian maiden with her boobs moved down to her knees.
Darrell Ray
Mostly just stuff with sex on the mind PROJECT into the picture and then others see when told to see it.
msgadget6905
I think the writers were REALLY stretching it with their explanations. You can see whatever you want if you look hard enough. I don’t go to the movies looking for hidden meanings. The Three Little Pigs picture was good.
PS- the political comments of some of the readers is just as crazy as the article. Why do some people have to make EVERYTHING about politics?
http://reality-bytes.hubpages.com/hub/Who-Is-The-Rothschild-Family William Rothschild
It’s no surprise at all. All disney movies have either subtle, subliminal, or outright sexual, satanic, and/or mind controlling features. Just google “Disney Bloodlines” and find out for yourself.
Oilnwater
Yeah better that our kids watch porn than this evil stuff
tammy
I’ve heard about the Rothschilds being in the Illuminati, and trying to destroy the world. Is that true??? I didn’t think so, but it makes just about as much sense as your comment
Lynn Yancosky
There is a book published years ago entitled “Subliminal Seduction.” In it the author reveals how advertisers use images of sex and death to subliminally draw the viewer into looking at the ad, stirring the unconscious mind so the product becomes more attractive to the consumer. Viewers are not consciously aware that this is happening. The use of the word “sex” can be found on about every magazine cover photos of female models. If you relax your mind in order not to try so hard to find it, you will notice the word, as well as more graphic ones, generally on the lighter brushed out areas of the cheek and above the eyes.
In case you may be doubtful about this, I am sure you have heard about department stores that have messages such as “I am a good employee, I will not steal merchandise,” and other such affirmations running beneath the Muzak playing in the store. It has been proven that this experiment has resulted in less employee theft.
Ads and shows today are more overtly sexual, but the hidden stuff is still there. While it may be partially the result of inside jokes amid animators, but I think the subliminal angle is at work here as well.
tammy
They used to use subliminal messages in advertisements but they were outlawed way back in about 1970
http://batman-news.com henry
They haven’t stated uit was the bible thumpers that supposedly found these things.
They have perveted minds.
I can’t see some of the things even when circled so we are supposed to see them.
Lynn Guss
Some people haev WAY too much time on their hands.
Charles Schwartz
Have you people nothing else to worry about?
Reece Marsden
I’m surprised that the one scene from Who Framed Roger Rabbit when Donald and Daffy Duck are playing dueling pianos and Donald calls Daffy a stupid N*****, how did that one get through and what is their explanation on that one
Christine Cuneo
Ever regret clicking on garbage.
Andy Frobig
Regret it? I live for it.
Kelvin Reid
Here is one that is real. In the original laserdisc release of ” Who Framed Roger Rabbit” Then head of Disney Michael Eisner home phone number is clearly visible.He of course changed it. And also in ” The Rescuers ” original home video release as they fall by a apartment windows you can see a naked women.This is much clearer on the laserdisc version.
John Strother
how many times are they going to show this? I mean really. To show it once was bad enough, but to rerun it so many times, they must be perverts as editors.
Kelvin Reid
This article must of been written by a Canadian as they spelled “favorite” wrong
Andy Frobig
You spelled “have” wrong, there’s no O or F in it.
jarod griffith
Who Framed Roger Rabbit is Touchstone Pictures. You just lost so much credibility.
Andy Frobig
Touchstone has been a fully owned subsidiary of Disney since its founding. And let’s face it, as soon as you put anything at all on the internet, your cred is zero.
jarod griffith
Thouche!
jarod griffith
Touche!
jarod griffith
A phone sex service? So full of shit. Worst article ever written.
Figjam_US
…I think the author(s) of this article have their own “penis” obsession – and are “seeing” things that simply are not there.
GameTime
Well ever since ABC bought Disney its been turned into one big liberal circus. Actually, I’m tired of the liberal messaging all over Disney these days and their crass commercialization. Very little “enchanting” about the place anymore.
Andy Frobig
Daggan libruls.
Oilnwater
yeah boo a liberal circus why not a good ol’fashioned conservative circus for a change!
Therese Pankey
Actually, you should get your facts straight. Disney bought ABC. I worked for ABC Cap Cities when Disney bought it and then chopped it up selling off all print, keeping only the broadcasting sections.
TomL
It’s the author that is stupid. He/she doesn’t know that “Disney” is a singular noun, not plural.
Oilnwater
They are using Disney as an adjective in the Byline. It describes the kind of movies; they are “Disney” movies.
Bob Shuttleworth
Someone has way to much time on their hands and much too vivid an imagination.
Elaine Floyd
I think the people who dreamed up this article need some therapy. I fail to see anything phallic or suggestive in any of these and the sausage photo? I’m not certain that wasn’t photo shopped in.
Evilcween
# 10 Hercules. The muse is standing with her lowaer body turned to the back. What we are seeing is her thigh. Her hands are clearly on her hips. You are an idiot!
Jessica Rabbit:
Lower half of body does not match up to the upper half of body. The crime here is obvious misalignment. There is no evidence of anything missing under her dress.
You are reaching.
AJCEditor
Nice. You gotta have a sense of humor
Animators have been having this type of fun forever.
me
Such a crock. I’m not even going to finish looking at this crap. If you look n the clouds, you see shapes, too. Who are you going to blame for THAT?
Silsez
I’ve seen every one of these movies with my kids. These examples are the products of some very sick minds. Keep your damaged fantasies to yourselves, PLEASE!
Craig Bohmont
Whoever sees these things probably wants to make a trip to the beach a chaperoned activity, due to the things they see in the sand!
Delphine Martin
Nah. Not rogue animators. Disney has been putting subliminal stuff in their productions from the beginning. Wat. You didn’t know this is a pedophiliac outfit?
tammy
You are kidding, right??? Or are you just sick????
Josh Carter
actually the aladdin line in my tape is far more disturbing. the line is “good teenagers take off their clothes”
Joan
What is the most incredible thing about this? That I plodded all the way through it! I must have a strange mind, because I have yet to see all those phallic symbols. Nor did is see the all-out-porn in the Rescuers poster. And to think, I have a friend who says a dirty mind is a joy forever. Mine must be clean? or confused.
JoAnn Irrgang
Did a 13 year old submit this…they see and hear sexual content in everything….can’t you get real writers??
pbob67
This is really proof the some people need to get a life… not a fan of Disney since Walt died, nonetheless, this is ridiculous… really
Granada
What dirty minds you all have!
Artie412
What crap.
ort
Disney seems to be doing this stuff on purpose. They ought to be ashamed of themselves, but they aren’t. I don’t think Disney is something a kid should be watching, based on what I have seen here. JMO.
*if you respond with nastiness just to be a jerk, then don’t. This is my opinion and I am entitled to it.*
Therese Pankey
Saying that Disney ought to be ashamed,I have to ask you, did you EVER notice these things in the movies BEFORE you read this? Think about it, don’t just take this one person’s word for it. If you enjoyed the movies before continue to enjoy them and ignore these rantings from an over active imagination.
ort
That this sort of stuff is in there to begin with is disturbing. Grown men putting sexual subliminal messaging in a CHILDREN’S movie is sick.
tammy
This article is just someones dirty mind, probably a 13 year old. Nobody sees them, because they are not really there. Look at the stars, you can see anything you want to. Now, is God putting them there? or is your own mind putting them there? Where they saw sex, I saw movie. But my imagination does not go that way. It’s just dumb little boy imagination
ort
I’m still not sure, but I hope you are correct. I really do.
Phillip Brandt
ridiculous ! Whoever wrote this article is hung up on penises. Really stretching there !
Beatrice Hornfluffer
Disney used to go to this kids house in LA He even gave him a personal tour of Disneyland before it opened. He as well as most other elites in LA were steeped into the occult/black magic and had orgies weekly. Can I verify this? No but I know this stuff happened. Another “guest’ of his home was Bob Hope.
Carol McMeans
Grow Up!!
becca marie
Seriously..The people who notices these things have way to much time on their hands!
James McGill
Our species has adapted an ability to identify patterns and to quickly extract signal from noise. It’s a serious advantage in the natural selection process — one of our most important assets. I wish that so much pre-code Hollywood material hadn’t been destroyed. I wish that the Hays code had not come about just when we were starting to get good panchromatic films, just when motion pictures were starting to be a national, or international, phenomenon. Weird puritan ideas got themselves embedded in every aspect of entertainment and today we pay a dear price for it.
TomL
Within the text, when referring to Disney, the studio, they consistently write: “Disney have” and “Disney were” instead of Disney has and was.
deville55
I would like to extend my hearty congratulations for assembling the most asinine waste of time in internet history. Additionally I would like to commend the editors and the entire Movieseum staff for supporting the moron who put this stream together
Natnat’s mom
i hate it when people turn cartoons to trash. ruins my cartoons. shame on your twisted mind.
terrythecork
Starting with Mike (the Kike, behind his back at Disney) Eisner. Disney is rife with Homos in Supervisory positions. The “Straight” employees are constantly hassled. Residents of Orlando refer to Disney as “The Mouse”, “The Rat”, or the “Faggot Kingdom”. Save your money and take the Kids to Gator Land, then stay in a nicer Motel with a Pool……Disney fucked Orlando…
Robert Thompson
So, what I gathered from this is that the person writing it is a 13 year old boy going through some major hormonal changes.
tammy
OK you won the comment of the day LOL
Yrral
Except for the three pigs (which wasn’t sexual), it seems that the illustrators of the more recent films have decided to hijack the Disney image for their own purposes.
John Baxter
Come on–this sort of “analysis” belongs on a conspiracy-theorist YouTube channel. You disingenuously present the material as if it were a settled matter that these scenes contain the hidden messages you ascribe to them. And what do we actually get? The usual unconvincing nonsense. In addition to that, if you knew what went into animating even a few seconds of a Disney film, you’d know that there is simply no possibility of a “disgruntled artist” sneaking forbidden material into a scene.
Therese Pankey
I disagree with “no possibility” aspect. There is always a way as an artist I know it can be done, but do you really think Disney would LET a disgruntled artist work on a piece? It would probably be done more as a joke to play on the adults watching.
John Baxter
No offense, Therese, but you’re wrong. In any animation feature, and especially at Disney, every single frame of animation is scrutinized by a boatload of people, including the director, and nothing subversive, no matter how subtle, could possibly pass undetected–or rather, it would have to be so subtle as to be completely invisible. This is an old “urban legend” about Disney that started when someone claimed they thought they could make out the word “sex” in The Lion King–there are entire websites devoted to the subject, just like there are channels and sites devoted to “seeing” alien corpses and artifacts in the photos taken by the Mars rovers. The only accurate claim in this article is that The Three Little Pigs contained a portrait of some sausage links titled “Father”–but that was deliberate and quite overt. The rest is utter nonsense, and you can ascertain that for yourself by just looking carefully at the “examples.”
MJ Comus
Hell, you don’t have to look for subliminal porn in Disney – it’s right out in the open! Go to the 8 minute mark in the 3 Little Pigs short “The Practical Pig” and watch him strap his 2 brothers into a spanking machine that paddles their bare bottoms until they’re glowing red. (Butt punishment shows up in quite a few of the old Disney shorts, as a matter of fact; I guess it was Walt’s hobby.)
Then there’s the ‘twitterpated’ scene in Bambi where Thumper and Flower meet and fall in love with their female counterparts: Thumper goes into a thumping orgasm that leaves him collapsed on the forest floor while Flower turns bright red and stiff as a board when he meets his girlfriend; nothing subliminal but pretty obviously symbolic!
curbie
I have one problem with one. Okay I love the little mermaid amd I watched it more then a thousand times. Get ur facts straight or watch the movie again. It made me angry u got that scene wrong. It was not ariel getting married to prince eric when the priest had a woody. It was ursla (misspelled) diguised as vanessa that was wrongfully trying to marry prince eric. When you write these articles. Research a piece u understand and get it right and get ready for the damn the fans to correct u on it. Cause u know im right about this. Grrr
Therese Pankey
Missing the point of the article, but point we’ll taken! I also noticed the author’s obvious faux pas.
zjak10
Man! Most of these are a real reach, and the others take a perverted mind to read anything into them.
rtrack
The Lion King- Really? I mean, really? Is this how a perv sees the world around (usually) him? Every cat he looks at is a naked woman’s a$$? Unbelievable.
Michael Renn
Whomever sees and hears lewd stuff here is a pervert.
Therese Pankey
Ok, I have to say this… The author of this article is OBVIOUSLY sex deprived or a nymphomaniac. I got news for you, you can’t travel ANYWHERE where you don’t see phalic symbols in buildings, i.e. Tajmahal, Capitol building in D.C., courthouse in almost every city/county/parish/state Capitol in the U.S., EMPIRE STATE BUILDING! Need I go on? As for the three little pigs I agree with the others. But, in “Who Framed Roger Rabbit”, really? All the violence, sexual induendos (spoof on adultery of Jessica playing “patty cakes”), and let’s not forget the beastiality aspect Roger and Jessica and YOU focus on one POSSIBLE squirl shot? This movie was never really meant for children. Now, I love this film because it is such a good spoof on all the old cartoons and film noir we used to watch, so take it in the light in which it was meant! All the rest are certainly a Rorschach test. You see what you want to see!
Therese Pankey
Should clarify… I agree that the 3 pigs cartoon was written at a time and in a venue when they were not really intended for children. So get a sex life. Maybe then you won’t have time to scrutinize for imaginary offences.
Peter Henderson
The author of this article is clearly trying to produce a passable diversion and earn his or her paycheck. I wouldn’t read more into it than that.
Bastian Alexander
The preacher’s “phallic form” in the Little Mermaid is actually his knee….
laurieangel64 .
Iam old enough that I remember the news story of the original 1st VHS release of little mermaid&the artist who drew the cover was fired for putting the penis on the castle&a new cover was made.if you have an original and compare it to later ones you can see the difference.don’t know about the rest though
breed7
A “careering” chase in the Rescuers? Was this written by an idiot? Do you seriously not know the word “careening”?
Naomi Lackey
I didn’t even go passed the 4th one. This is ridiculous. Disney movies are still the most enjoyable to watch & listen to. The new artists are not as good as the old one’s – the new movies all are made with a ‘dark’ side. People who don;t want life to be good, will always find something ‘bad’ to discuss. Thumbs down, on this article.
Nati
#3 that’s not Ariel, that’s Ursula dressed as a human. If you can’t get that right, how are people suppose to believe all this nonsense?
Centralist
Everything is either concave or convex,
Therefore everything has something to do with sex.
-Piet Hein
thirdarmy
Check out the bad, alcohol-induced dream in Dumbo. There’s a lot there to see. I am surprised it wasn’t mentioned.
John Galt
1. No hidden image there, unless you see phalluses everywhere or subscribe to whacko conspiracy theories.
2. No hidden image there, unless you see thongs everywhere or subscribe to whacko conspiracy theories.
3. No hidden image there, unless you see phalluses everywhere or subscribe to whacko conspiracy theories.
4. No hidden image there, unless you hear invitations to strip everywhere or subscribe to whacko conspiracy theories.
5. No hidden image there, unless you see “sex” everywhere or subscribe to whacko conspiracy theories.
6. No hidden image there, unless you see phalluses everywhere or subscribe to whacko conspiracy theories.
7. The first true hidden image in the article, dropped in by bored animators as a joke.
8. No hidden image there, unless you see panty-less women everywhere or subscribe to whacko conspiracy theories.
9. The image is there but it’s neither hidden nor out of character.
10. No hidden image there, unless you see panty-less women everywhere or subscribe to whacko conspiracy theories.
Read snopes.com, people—not the garbage at movieseum.
Mark Forsyth
This really is fairly tame.Max Fleisher and the Betty Boop cartoons are much more blatant,and funny.
Dozerman
Yet another bullshit click-bait article that I have inexplicably wasted my time on again… i cant actually see what im typing because a massive advertisement is covering my entire screenmmmm same with the article
908Whiteman
Madeup BS
http://jerryskids.bandcamp.com Jerry Skids
The person who wrote this article clearly doesn’t know about Snopes.com or Widescreen. Maybe they should’ve done a little research?
David Len Allen
Also in Three Little Pigs is a portrait of father by the fireplace who must have been an actor in a previous carnation: He’s a ham!
Equanimity
that’s not a frame in the movie, that’s on the original movie cover
http://saberpoint.blogspot.com/ Stogie Chomper
Several books have been written about the use of subliminal images in advertising. ["Subliminal" is defined as "below the level of conscious perception"]. The word “Sex” is often hidden in ads, paintings and photos, in order to make the images more appealing. The conscious mind is not aware of these images, and they enter by the back door of the mind, the subconscious. I have no doubt that sexy images hidden in Disney movies are not “jokes by bored artists,” but deliberately placed to make their films more interesting. This practice of subliminal images to affect the moods, excitement and interest of the viewers is widespread. Disney is by no means the only company that uses them. You will find them in glossy magazine ads and many television ads.
Almostalibertarian
That was the 70′s man……..stuff really doesn’t work anyway.
Oh yes it does work, and studies have proven it. I doubt that the human subconscious has changed much since the 1970s. Do you have any basis for your opinion?
Pax Humana
Everyone please quit polluting the air, land, water, noise levels, and gene pool, REGARDLESS if you are on the left, right, middle, fringe, or whatever else, period! ALL of you are evil and your mothers should have swallowed!
Green Lama
This is STUPID…
Christopher
What amazes me is how many people on a “blog” can act rude to each about an article about cartoons. So many brave people hiding behind these computer screens.
Fraudian Slip
I agree, we should vandalize the Vatican tomorrow at noon. And then, phase 2 with the camels.
Jerry Masters
What about the 3 pigs? In that shot where two of the brothers are Pantsless, they are also lacking Genitals. Who knew Disney had them castrated?
Walter Brennen
Those with dirty minds will imagine lots of things. How about Snow White and the 7 dwarfs-living together??
Walter Brennen
That said – - – get your mind out of the gutter and look for the enjoyment in it.
Conrad Patterson
If you have the original VHS version this palace is on the cover too. They revised that artwork as well. It’s definitely what it looks like. Even as little kids we identified it and laughed our asses off.
morning_in_america
Well, we can see this happens regularly in recent years. This is Hollywood, remember. A little subliminal humor that goes past the kids and either amuses or enrages parents. I prefer the old Bugs Bunny cartoons which were open about the adult jokes while entertaining for kids.
Justactsplease
Actually, looking at him standing on the decorative stepping stool establishes the short length of his legs, and it sort of could be his knee.
Mugwump
It is the PERVERT who THINKS he sees sex objects everywhere he looks. Good one, PERVERT.
USNbubblehead
As for the three little pigs, there is also a picture of a football with the title ‘Mother’ hanging on the wall as well.
justme
Anyone find the hidden Mickey in “Who Framed Roger Rabbit” ??
Jacob D Johnston
They’re just grabbing at straws with most of these! Idiots, with nothing better to do!
Raven Wolf
The sausage is also shaped like ovaries
Pastor Dave
This is really dumb! Way too far a stretch!
fedupintx
The Little Mermaid Phallic spire is from the VHS cover. Even the “frame capture” shows the title of the movie as it appears on the cover art. “Disney have tried to scrap the frame from the movie after people started to complain”. Aside from just bad English, it’s wrong.
Kristina
I don’t know why I read this myself. It is pretty dumb. People finding thing wrong that aren’t really wrong. Seriously?
Kristina
That is Ursula marring Erik! And that skin showing in Hurcules is thigh. Get your facts straight
Cary Harrison
The Little Mermaid castle was ONLY on the original release’s movie cover. It does NOT appear in the film and Disney recalled the movie and replaced it for anyone that actually sent it back. Also, the artist can’t deny doing it, because he is the person that pointed it out in the first place once he was officially no longer working at Disney. Hopefully, the rest of your article is better than part 1.
Dakota Barry
Photoshop anyone?
K A Mears-Kolesnikoff Carter
I’m only on picture three and already this sex starved villain (unless it’s on your mind why would you go looking for these images) has made a serious blooper. the wedding scene, as EVERYONE who has seen the movie knows it NOT Ariel and the prince, but Ursala (she’s the sea witch) and the prince under an enchantment (he thinks she is the one who saved his life). So I’m wondering if this person really saw any of these movies or just compiled a bunch of pictures from them that other people said had hidden images??
robell424
This is pathetic. You have to need to see something REALLY bad to find this innocuous stuff “titillating” or whatever it’s supposed to be. Another one of the more and more frequent moments when I am embarrassed to be a human.
Daddie Tang
Another load of bullshit from msn.
chaotician
This is so ridiculous! Clearly this is a case of boulders in eyes of the thought police! And I’m willing to wager each is some “true” Believer in dear ole Jesus!
Jamie Hirsch
I’m gay.
Proud_to_be_American
So?
Makimaus
In picture Number 3, that isn’t Ariel, it’s Ursula/Vanessa.
fatibel
Bikini briefs maybe. Definitely not a thong.
Curtis Russell Howard
I caught this while watching Kronk’s New Groove
Shawn Earle
As Michael Jackson would say. No that’s Ignorant!
mike wheeler
Sponge Bob square pants has a lot of adult jokes that kids wouldn’t catch onto.
Jack Waltz
#5 wasn’t star writing, it was plant matter made airborne as Simba flopped down on the ledge. Did the writer actually watch these movies?
Rupert_Murdoch68
Re: Jews
The world’s ten wealthiest people are Jewish. I was also surprised to learn that the 40 most wealthy people in the world were Jewish and only 2 of them weren’t Jewish – one was a Muslim and one was a Nazi sympathiser. Even two Chinese and two Indian nationals were Jewish.
Of course this indicates that the Jews are not only smart people , but also the most greedy and ruthless. First and foremost they influence and change governments, control the media, alter international demographics and trample on people to get to the top. Looking up the information on each of these multi-billionaires indicated many drive their workers like slaves.
Most people don’t have a problem with entrepreneurialism – but how many people are destroyed just to make way for these ambitious people to realise their dreams. Obviously it has something to do with Judaism not their race, otherwise we would see Muslims follow the same path.
A stylish monthly now owned by the billionaire Zionist Newhouse family— published an annual list of the 100 most powerful people in America, what this monthly calls “the New Establishment.”
What this amazing list reveals is a reality that many will find hard to accept: America’s “New Establishment” is overwhelmingly dominated by Jewish figures or those who are on the payroll of or dependent upon Jewish families and financial interests that bankroll the powerful Israeli military in Israel through American interests, and the lobbies in America. That conclusion—however “offensive” or “controversial” in the eyes of some people—is inescapable.
It’s a list of “the world’s most powerful people,” 100 of the bankers and media moguls, publishers and image makers who shape the lives of billions. It’s an exclusive, insular club, one whose influence stretches around the globe but is concentrated strategically in the highest corridors of power. More than half its members, at least by one count, are Jewish.
It’s a list, in other words, that would have made earlier generations of Jews jump out of their skins, calling attention, as it does, to their disproportionate influence in finance and the media.
Making matters worse, in the eyes of many, would no doubt be the identity of the group behind the list—not a pack of fringe anti-Semites but one of the most mainstream, glamorous publications on the newsstands. The list would seem to conform to all the traditional stereotypes about areas of Jewish overrepresentation.
Guess who owns Disney.
Joe Cogan
Of the 10 richest people in the world, only one, Larry Ellison, is Jewish. The rest of what you had to say is similarly nonsensical.
nocoteabagger
Anti-Semitic hogwash…
Rupert_Murdoch68
facts are neither anti-semitic or hogwash just facts
That’s a Fact
Whatever moron wrote this piece is a friggin jerk (and a perv) While some see Jesus in their toast, this clown sees penises
kelley
There will always be idiots, with too much free time on their hands, that will search for weirdo stuff in the good done by others.. come on… No undies? no genitals? penises everywhere… Get a real job! If you look hard enough and you could say the same things about a Shop-Rite or JC Penny Circular. Oh and let’s NOT let Toys ‘R’ Us, off the hook! :-/ Ridiculous……….
stampece
Ha ha ha I was going to write the exact same thing. Not only is it the worst junk ever; whoever wrote it can’t write.
harleydog
Far from the worst ever this is yahoo
Zakary Shupe
Who Framed Rodger Rabbit is not a Disney movie
Byron C Mayes
It’s Touchstone, which is a Disney-owned banner.
kmanthie
That Little Mermaid thing is total BS – there’s no way anyone who’s just watching the cartoon could notice that there was a “hidden penis” as part of the make-up of the castle in the background-when you see it unmagnified, there’s no way to make this supposed phallus out. Sure, some crafty animator may have sneaked it in the way described, but no one who wasn’t looking for it w/a magnifying glass, w/the video on freeze-frame would ever notice it. The only reason prissy, hung-up white bread American parents are squawking about it is because of articles like this that point this alleged stuff out – there’s not even any proof that it is real.
kmanthie
No defending priests here, but… the #3 part of this article is REALLY reaching! In that frame of the wedding scene from the Little Mermaid cartoon, that -whatever it is, does not look like a penis- not anatomically.
kmanthie
From the looks of it, the Three Little Pigs mention is, for one thing, not at all “hidden”, not in a way that makes it ambiguous or hard to see- that picture on the wall of the sausage links that reads “Father” on the bottom, is right out there, plain as day; but what is the big deal about that??? Everyone knows pork is pig meat – duh. It’s not like there’s a picture of an actual pig being slaughtered or something disgusting – just a friggin’ joke that would’ve been not even blinked at by audiences back in the 30s or 40s or whenever it originally came out. Some people -these days, anyway, just have to mellow out and not let their ids run wild.
kmanthie
Stupid article – I agree w/most of the other comments on here. What’s the point of this? WHO CARES?? at least 99% of these examples were made from imagining things that weren’t there in the 1st place. Sure, it’s possible that a “disgruntled animator” or 2 (or 3) may have slipped something saucy into a cel or two, while creating the animation, but – hey, that’s life, deal w/it; besides, the things that this article pointed out are obscure at best and, like the supposed “phallus” built in to the castle edifice in a scene from Little Mermaid, the writers of this article had to use a magnified close-close-close-up to point this penis-like thing built into the castle, which, in the unmagnified scene, is not at all noticeable. Now, that thing about The Rescuers (I believe I did see that cartoon in a theater when I was a kid in the 70s), upon looking at it, may be real, but you just see one frozen-frame of an animation cel that is a part of thousands -i.e., during a viewing of The Rescuers, it’s doubtful in the extreme that anyone would ever notice a small, barely noticeable (even in the frozen frame shot) poster, advertising a porn flick. So what? Who do you think were drawing the animation cels for these cartoons- 5 year old children? No, they were adults, many of whom, no doubt, were “disgruntled” by working at “Mauschwitz” -the nickname a lot of Disney employees gave to their employers, for good reasons.
YourWifeIsMyLife
“Who cares?” YOU care; you’ve written far more than any one else in the thread.
ectogamit
I thought the Aladdin thing said “good teenagers take off their clothes”
Richard Brandt
someone has way too much time on their hands.
http://hystericallyassertive.blogspot.com/ Scott
Whatev, the only Disney film worth watching anymore IMO is Hercules. The animation style is unlike original Disney and James Woods kills as Hades.
Bill Gilroy
Stupid article, but there are always subliminal messages in a lot of characters. Just look at The Purple Dinosaur Barney with BJ & Baby Bop
yellowkid49
I quit after the first one, pretty dumb, why do I click on those come on????
Byron C Mayes
Also in The Three Little Pigs (same scene) is a picture of a football labelled “Mother”
Surprised you missed it.
fivestars
These are all a bunch of nothing, like people playing music backwards to find a hidden meaning. There are no hidden messages, only people with brains that should be checked.
Dan Sabedra
I wanted to see penis!
mrtwobit
Sorry, couldn’t make it through for all the damn advertising.
Jon Dangerously
Just to be clear, “Who Framed Roger Rabbit?” was not released as a Disney film. It was made by Amblin Entertainment and released by Touchstone Pictures. Sure they’re owned by Disney, but so was Miramax when Pulp Fiction came out, and no one calls that a Disney film.
Yes it had Disney characters, but also characters from many other companies.
David A .Hereaux
10 things you never noticed about your favorite Disney movies. There are eleven things and twelve pages. O_o
Billy
Come on. This is like 5 people looking up at the same cloud in the sky and ” seeing” 5 different resemblances to objects. What a dumb article.
http://www.m00nchild313.deviantart.com/ shanna
ummm … that’s not ariel the prince is about to marry, that’s ursula in disguise. just sayin … #factcheckfolley
Zerothe
70′s porn was getting big. With John Holmes being the guy this article makes plenty of sense. Remember that scene in the movie theater in Fight Club, same type of humor but on a bigger scale. Yes I was amused by the article because I have a d*ck and a sense of humor and am not to stuck up to admit it. If you think about it this has to be the first introduction to humor we all face, unless you are to cool to admit it.
Paul Bledsoe
Roger rabbit is not Disney movie just saying;P
Fairisfair
People have way too much time on their hands. They must sit and scrutinize every movie frame by frame.
FGH369
I was hoping ‘sylvester’ the cat would be mentioned, when he dropped the ‘F’ bomb. More specifically when he said ‘what da F***’. Check it out on Youtube.
Johnny Smith
That’s not even Ariel, it’s Ursula
GJI
Well that was a complete waste of 5 minutes.
ThatIsAll
I would just like to point out that in the second mention of the Little Mermaid (the one about the priest), that is NOT Ariel he is marrying, it is Vanessa, or rather, Ursula, the sea witch, in disguise. That is all.
RD
Funny no #1. I guess the creep realized it was all bs.
As to “11 Things You Never Noticed About Your Favourite Disney Movies,”
the answers are clearly
1. nothing, 2. nothing, 3. nothing, 4. nothing,
5. nothing, 6. nothing, 7. nothing, 8. nothing,
9. nothing, 10. nothing, 11. nothing,
elmcqueen3
Jihadist hate these 3 little pigs…They wouldn’t touch any pig with a 10 foot pole just in case they get the animals blood on em…Touching the blood of any pig would disqualify them from having contact with 70 virgins in the heavenly there after…I mean like who wants to end up diddling a bunch of pigs instead of some cute virgins…Perhaps they’re not so cute and they all look like Nancy Pelosi…That would be a horrific pig in a poke!
Michele Henson
Oh, this is really reaching!
I’ll admit it’s designed to further diminish traditions & things that conservatives view as “pure”.
But I’ve heard it all over time from liberals …
about how “racist” Walt Disney & bugs bunny are! I don’t know if Walt was or wasn’t but a LOT of people were back then so it’s not exactly the crime of the century!!
Take it for face value … notice the word favourite is spelled with a ‘U’, that’s done in Canada & England… We know what their views of America are!!!
compresale
The sausage links on the wall don’t seem like a such a big deal considering back then the average person was alot more likely to have seen the whole “farm animal” process. I doubt it would be considered all that “dark” during that time period.
ajmrowland .
So much has been either disproven or-in the case of TLM video case-explained with common sense and a picture of any real life coral, The Santa Clause one was one kid dialing the same number three years after the movie was released. It’s clearly just a coincidence, otherwise they would’ve gone with the obvious fake numbers everyone else does. The Aladdin one was addressed on the DVD and would have taken an obscene amount of people in the recording process, including the actor, to get that one in. The “Sex” in The Lion King was not only claimed to be “SFX” but step-framing through the scene in slow motion on video makes it clear that the “bottom line” on the “E” does not stick around any longer than the random assortment of leaves around the entire word. The priest in TLM was shown bending his knees in enough shots to explain that one(though I’m still glad they erased it because modern society is perverted, even me) These would have been amusing-hilarious even-if so many people didn’t have enough vitriol to believe them. Really the only reason stuff like this exists is because gossip, especially the “shocking” kind still sells. They were interesting once, 10 years ago, and I actually thought there might be something new here, but nope.
dingus
actually, for the lion king “SEX” in the stars scene, it actually says “SFX” as in “sound effects.”
the reason this was added, was because the animators and the sound effects crew had striked up a friendship with each other during production, and they would pull silly pranks on each other from time to time.
so the animation crew added in “SFX” as a gag/easter egg to the SFX crew.
this is debunked in an interview with the crew who worked on the lion king. look it up.
MisterManReturns
This is garbage.
Mayorb
Disney’s darkest moment was 1958, Winter Wonderland. We all know the scene where the lemmings all run off the cliff, right? They were thrown!!!! Lemmings aren’t indigenous to that part of Canada so the production crew bought them from Inuit children! This is HIGHLY documented that Disney bought and killed these animals to add interest to the film! Holy Cow!
http://www.spartahere.com/ PW70
Well that’s what they did in show business back then. They also beat child movie stars to make them cry.
Matt
To make this site usuable, go into your tools menu or wherever it is, and disable javascript, all the popups and the jumping page settles down
stealthdan
Thank you! I just read the comments.
KGC
I have seen most of these before and they are generally an “Is it there or is it not there?” thing. The Three Little Pigs one though? That is great!
SonicScrewDriver
I think I saw most of the stuff from “The Lion King”, “The Little Mermaid” and “Aladdin” on “Inside Edition” years ago, because some group (called “family council” something or other) was complaining that “Disney” was trying to corrupt young children with sexual innuendo.
They also complained that the bad guy in “The Hunchback Of Notre Dame”, “Judge Claude Frollo’s” fantasies about a dancing “Esmeralda” were too sexual for little kids.
Megan
Roger Rabbit isn’t a movie for children.
TrumpKennels
yes. i didn’t see ANY of their supposed mis-doings.
http://home.com redone
this is so stupid, most of these are just ‘reaching’, like finding shapes and faces in the clouds.
readingyou
Three Little Pigs. Genuinely clever and funny. The rest–just dumb and predictable. Of course the Pigs one is the oldest, back in the days when creativity still reigned.
Jarbeez
The person who wrote this article obviously needs to get laid really bad….
Benkarkis
yup they “sucked” me in too. Totally worthless.
guest 2.0
I didn’t get the 3 little pigs one ???
grainne mhaille
ridiculous stupid article how can you call yourself a journalist this is waste of time grow up and get a real job
No surprise
Walt Disney used to draw porno before he started to make kid movies so this not a surprise. Its like Hugh Hefner he used to draw kid cartoons then turned to nude mags.
YourWifeIsMyLife
Or the S & M fetish art by Joe Shuster who created “Superman.”
Melissa Leman
Most of these things listed have already been proven to be false. This is a bad article.
Gabrilla
Whoever said Jessice Rabbit is the hottest cartoon character ever drawn, has CLEARLY never watched anime
Tina A Brown
I think the person that wrote this article is a pervert and he/she should be watched. smh
John Cox
The Author has never even seen Little Mermaid apparently. Spoiler Eric is not marrying Ariel in picture number 9.
Spamalot
Old. This stuff is old.
Chazz
AKA 3 movie scenes that were explicitly “snuck in” (the background of the Adventurers, Jessica’s quick flash, the number in the Santa Clause), one from a movie POSTER (no such “frame” exists in the movie itself), and the rest are all things that people were trying way too hard to see/hear something that wasn’t there, but the internet has blathered about for years (or decades).
Sigh. And I was on such a roll of seeing articles that actually had what the headline stated :/
G Morgan
the little mermaid penis tower is not a freeze frame like this article says. It’s on the cover. It’s obviously on the cover. At no point in the movie is there a frame that looks exactly like the cover that you have to pause the tape to see. The author of this piece is an idiot.
Ashley Furman
What the fuck, I was expecting quality here. This is garbage.
jnobfan
I know money is tight but please go buy some extra food and supplies for your family in case something happens to our Electric Grid or ISIS blows something up on 9-11 or the Russians hack the banks or whatever. Our world and country is spiriting out of control and you cannot count on the Community Organizer to keep you safe or feed your kids if the stores are closed. 9-11 is a week away please go spend some money and buy some supplies just in case.
TW
There’s a TYPO in in #3 (Hercules). Second sentence should say “bet,” not “but.”
Get Fuzzy
This is nothing new and apart from #1, it’s BS. More urban mythology.
Bob Shuttleworth
I’ve seen, or heard all of these before, and the majority, if not all, are the product of an enormously over active imagination, with a touch of sexual frustration on the side.
Charmaine Jackson
I thought there was nothing wrong with the article. I remember laughing about those movies years ago. It was funny then and it’s funny now. I didn’t expect anything other than what was headlined so good job. It made me laugh and riminisce a little bit.
paul
This is a good topic that is covered much better with a simple google search. This is poorly researched and ‘written’ by a baby intern I’m guessing.
At least please get the little mermaid dick towers info right. It wasn’t ever a complaint of frames in the film. The image was on the cover of millions of VHS copies sold and only later did the truth come out, everyone taking another look at their copy. By the way, please hire a real digital graphics person that can reproduce a clear image of your example, anyone with a year of photoshop could do better.
toobusytocare
Dumb. Unless it’s pointed out by the pervert of the article, and I tend to be a little perverted myself, I don’t see it…how stupid.
Dan Cochran
BTW, that pop-up “Check Out Popular Articles” thing is VERY irritating!
Sharon Louise
some of these are just interpretations.. and most likely MISinterpretations.
rdsmith
In slide #9, that is NOT Ariel getting married. Also, I heard these same claims from a guy I sat in front of in the sixth grade, and that was back in ’94. Fast-breaking news and flawless details, guys.
Sabrina
Prince Erick is not marrying Arial in the scene with the boner priest. He was marrying Ursula in disguise.
Kara Way
This is all a bunch of made up bullshit. What asshole wrote this??
Fenrisbh
There’s nothing “hidden” about the sausages/3 Little Pigs father. I remember noticing that as a little kid seeing that 3 LP cartoon. Realized the “commentary” of it but back then it was totally normal to know that pigs ended up as sausages. It wasn’t “shocking” or “hidden.”