12 Amazing Films The Critics Hated

http://rodneywelch.blogspot.com/ RodneyWelch

This list is completely wrong. “The critics” did NOT hate these movies. All the writer did was select 12 well-known movies, found a bad review or two somewhere, and pretended it was majority opinion. The exception is “Ace Ventura,” which has only been described as amazing exactly once, and that was by whoever wrote this silly, silly article.

Brad King

This is mostly correct. Unforgiven, for one, actually was critically acclaimed– I know that for a fact. In fact, it deduted in 1998 on AFI’s top-100 movies list at #98, and it’s generally considered one of the best westerns ever. In fact, it IS the best western ever in my opinion.
- http://www.examiner.com/outdoor-recreation-in-newark/brian-sniatkowski briansnat
  
  “Unforgiven” is the third best western ever, behind “Stagecoach” and “The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance”, in my opinion of course. “The Searchers” and “High Noon” would round out my top 5.
  - mcgin029
    
    The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance is very, very good. I’ve always been distracted by the middle-aged Stewart and Wayne playing people who are supposed to be in their 20s. But that is balanced out by the quality of the acting.
    - http://www.examiner.com/outdoor-recreation-in-newark/brian-sniatkowski briansnat
      
      The age of the actors never bothered me. What did was the hole in the story. How Tom Donaphin, the “Toughest man south of the picket wire” somehow became a totally unknown entity within a generation. In the real world people would have been telling stories about him well into their dotage. I know the point was that the town grew up and the significance that his rough ways were a thing of the past, but you’d think that despite that, old timers would be talking about him years later. The idea that the local newspaper would have no clue as to who he was despite his former significance in the town’s history, was pretty absurd. That said, great, great movie.
    - http://Handsome.com kG
      
      Wayne and Stewart were not middle aged but were in their thirties at the time. I think we are just used to men acting like teenagers now,back then men looked like men not boys!
  - dicksicario
    
    Nope greatest western ever filmed was Sergio Leone’s
    ONCE UPON A TIME IN THE WEST
    Only movie Fonda ever was in where he was the Villian
    Greatest , and longest , gunfight ever filmed
    ” ya brought two horses to many ” Bronson’s finest film.
    
    Course you do have to stick with it for the first two hours to figure out what is going on.
    - http://www.examiner.com/outdoor-recreation-in-newark/brian-sniatkowski briansnat
      
      Once Upon a Time… is certainly a great western. Definitely in my top 10
- joeymegatron
  
  “Magnificent Seven”? Not a western, or did you forget about it? Not to mention, “My Darling Clementine”? “The Good, the Bad, the Ugly”? ” I wouldn’t make Unforgiven even Eastwood’s best; “High Plains Drifter” is much better, IMO.
  - http://www.examiner.com/outdoor-recreation-in-newark/brian-sniatkowski briansnat
    
    All are great, and I would add The Outlaw Josey Wales to that list.
  - The_RS_Gadfly
    
    I wouldn’t count The Magnificent Seven as a western. It’s too obviously an homage to Akira Kurosawa’s Seven Samurai. If you have a serious masochistic bent watch The Seven Samurai, The Magnificent Seven, and Battle Beyond the Stars back to back. It’s the same story presented three different ways.
  - insi10
    
    The Magnificent 7 is magnificent, but isn’t a western. It’s a
    
    Japanese samurai pic with different costumes.
    - rayb_baby
      
      That and A Fistful of Dollars.
- pisher
  
  It’s a decent movie, but it’s not even one of Clint Eastwood’s ten best westerns.
- insi10
  
  Belongs behind Once Upon A Time In The West, but as you point out, it was acclaimed. 95% positive critics.
pisher

I just came across this–man, somebody did not do their research. I mean, Casablanca won the Academy Award for Best Picture! Yeah, there’s a neglected masterpiece for ya.

Ace Ventura was badly reviewed, and RIGHTLY reviewed. It’s a crap movie, that is only remembered for having set Jim Carrey on the road towards making much better films (along with a few that are even worse).

Just because you can find a few bad reviews of a classic film doesn’t mean the film got bad reviews as a whole. All movies get some bad reviews. I mean, Pauline Kael panned Star Wars, so why isn’t that on the list?

Brad King

Untamed Heart is an very good film, yet not critically acclaimed. Christian Slater and Marisa Tomei both put in excellent performances, and film a current of genuine emotion and sentimentality (that was not sappy in any way) flows through the film, yet the critics somehow missed it.

Bill Bush

in “All About Eve” this moron calls Bette Davis…..Bette Midler, this shows how totally clueless they are, they know absolutely nothing about movies and just pretend that they do.

Jeffrey Martini

I thought it was maybe translated from The Chinese. How stupid can you be. They also referred to Speed Racer as Speed Rader. In Giant bold letters.
- rayb_baby
  
  I gave them a pass on the Speed Radar because it was corrected in the text, although that does show lack of their editorial integrity. But the Bette Midler ………. YEEESH, that is inexcusable.
insi10

Yeah. She doesn’t even have Bette Davis eyes.

http://www.examiner.com/outdoor-recreation-in-newark/brian-sniatkowski briansnat

I recall some of these movies receiving considerable critical acclaim at the time of their release. “Unforgiven”, “Apocalypse Now”, “Annie Hall” and “Godfather Part 2″ come immediately to mind. I wasn’t around for some of the older ones so I can’t say for sure how they were generally received. Because a few critics didn’t like them doesn’t mean all the critics didn’t like them. I challenge the author to find a single movie, no matter how widely acclaimed, that didn’t have some negative reviews at the time it was released.

BTW, Bette Midler was 5 years old when “All About Eve” was released. It was Bette Davis, who is hardly underrated.

insi10

” I challenge the author to find a single movie, no matter how widely
acclaimed, that didn’t have some negative reviews at the time it was
released.”

Rotten Tomatoes actually does list a few movies with 100% critical approval. But that only reinforces your point.

Michael Russell

Many of these movies were Oscar Winners at the time — Hollywood loved The Graduate, nominated for Best Picture, Bonnie and Clyde won two Oscars, Clint Eastwood was hailed for The Unforgiven — and it won 4 Oscars! Why in the world would you publish this? This is total misinformation.

igfarben

All About Eve with the underrated Bette Middler? Who knew?

JamesM

This is as stupid as “name five movies without an “E” in their title, and all of the other junk that gets posted as revelatory. Kick me for reading it. Badly researched, wrongly skewed and a plain waste of time.

Mazcalsone

MEMO TO SELF: Never, ever click on a link to such garbage as this. Bette Midler was five years old when All About Eve was released. Brainless and clueless site. ‘We won’t be fooled again…’

Jim Miller

This is the stupidest, most poorly written and researched piece I’ve ever read on motion pictures. Where did this moron do his research? Unforgiven won four Oscars, for Christ sake, Bonnie and Clyde won two, and both were nominated for Best Picture.

mrasnders2

I agree, Also When was Bette Midler ever in “All about Eve”? Was that not Bette Davis?!!!!

Bradondo

Every time I give this awful site a chance to redeem itself it just digs itself deeper and deeper into a cesspit rank with badly researched, poorly written offal. I often wonder if the various columnists have actually seen the films they’re writing about. Every article I’ve read has been packed with misinformation, the quality of the writing is uniformly awful and there appears to be no editorial process in place whatsoever. I’ve seen multiple entries where the article is discussing one film but heads the page with a photo from an unrelated film, plots and details are often erroneously displayed without any regard for fact-checking (an entry on Blade Runner once described future LA as “virtually abandoned” for example, ignoring the throngs of people jostling each other on the streets and sidewalks in nearly every outdoor scene), actors’ names are misspelled or, even worse, credited for films in which they didn’t appear, and demonstrably fringe and contrarian opinions are presented regarding well-known works as if they are the commonly accepted majority view. Moviseum demonstrates everything that can go wrong with web-based content publishing, and its an affront to true film fans everywhere. This will be the last click they tally from me :/

Frank Washington

The site got you to click, though. It’s job is done.

Brian Weston Blamires

HEY!!! It’s Speed Racer NOT Speed Rader!!!!!!!!!!

VOICEOFREASON

Generally Imake a point to go see the movies the critics don’t like . Seldom if ever have I been sorry i didn’t listen to a critic

Pixie5

Not only is this a poorly written article, but apparently no one has even monitored the comments in order to make even the smallest corrections on the “facts” presented. Bette Midler??? Actually the whole thing needs to be trashed. Don’t you people want people to like your website? Hello??? Anyone home???

Guest

The best” Western” ever made / why “The Seven Samurai “of course .Honorable mention-”The Ox Bow Incident” & “A Fistfull of Dollars”.

missieb2000

Speed Racer was stupid, is still stupid, will remain stupid.

Frank Washington

I haven’t seen it, but I doubt it was as stupid as this article calling the movie “Speed Rader”!

Golum

WOW…Bette Midler…She was probably a 5 year old at the time but I’m sure she’ll appreciate that you subbed her for her namesake!!!

pfon71361

I’m with everyone else here. This article doesn’t make any sense.

Zac Millions

Call it heresy, but I actually find the Godfather series petty, indulgent and over hyped. The acting is superb though. Apocalypse Now is visually stunning but the butchery of Heart of Darkness hurts. Any of the Sergio Leon series trumps Unforgiven without a doubt.

Jeffrey Martini

Disagree. Unforgiven had a depth and texture that none of the Leone films had. It was much thinner on bloodshed. If I am picking a second place Eastwood western it’s Josey Wales.
- dicksicario
  
  Leone’s depth and texture were definately in his classic
  ONCE UPON A TIME IN THE WEST
  It was panned big time, has made more in Video Sales than it ever did in theaters.

disqustang

“Speed Rader”? Even Racer was boring. Bette Midler in All About Eve? Was this article originally written in Tagalog?

Paul Doig

Ever one is pointing out the Bette Milder blunder, but how about the picture of All About Eve, and they used a TNT colorized still! One of the best movies ever in black and white, and winner of 13 academy awards, and they show a painted over art still? here are 10 classics that were panned
1) Female Troubles- John Waters
2) Night Mother- Anne Bancroft and Sissy Spacek
3) Hard Candy
4) Nightmare on Elm Street
5) Little Big Man -Dustin Hoffman
6) Cry In The Dark- Streep
7) Sid and Nancy
8) Breakfast Club
9) Stand By Me
10) Do The Right Thing _ Spike Lee
and one more
-Too Kill A Mocking Bird

Jeffrey Martini

I don’t recall the critical response to Do The Right Thing, but it was nominated for best picture. I remember because Billy Crystal, noting that Spike Lee wasn’t nominated for Director, quipped when announcing the BP nominees: “Do The Right Thing – the picture that evidently directed itself.”

Matt S

I must be crazy. Unforgiven was nominated for multiple Oscar Awards the year it was released and won Best Picture and Best Director. How can a universally panned and “overshadowed” movie accomplish this?

Even Rotten Tomatoes shows a 95% critic approval percentage.

What’s with this writer?

Dan Cochran

I liked the first two Atlas Shrugged movies, but the big city-based critics predictably panned both of them. To each his own…

warrenzoell

You forgot 2001 a space odyssey. It was panned upon its release by critics.

dicksicario

Hal didn’t think so

Oliver

Your writer must be very young, or just made stuff up. There are scores of films that meet the criteria you describe in the article (and title), but none of these qualify.

I was an active movie goer when most of these films came out, and for starters, Unforgiven (winner of 4 Oscars including best picture & director) and Annie Hall (winner of best picture, director, screenplay and actress) and Godfather Part 2 (winner of 6 Oscars, including best picture, director, screenplay and actor) were never panned by mainstream critics, let alone “hated”. In fact, most were hailed as masterpieces DURING their theatrical runs. It’s true that Wizard of Oz and Casablanca weren’t hailed as classics during their initial release, but they weren’t panned or hated either. One has to keep in mind that both were released during Hollywood’s “Golden Age”, when major films were released every week, and even the biggest movie stars worked year round as part of the studio system. For example, Wizard was released within the same period as The Adventures of Robin Hood and Gone With the Wind, so it had some competition. I also noticed the bad “reviews” you occasionally use as evidence have no attribution; don’t know if they were written by reputable, working film critics, or if they’re even real. And calling Ace Ventura and Speed Racer classics…makes me believe that they are the only films you’ve ever seen. A worthless and actively false (if not fake) article. These are all lies, folks. Your suggestions in the comments are far more accurate.

mcgin029

Unforgiven has a 95% rating on Rotten Tomatoes. This is a dumb article.

Schexy

I have never commented on an internet article but this is the dumbest piece of uninformed laziness I have ever read. I am stupider for having read it. Half of these films that everyone “hated” won multiple oscars, no one regards Speedracer as a classic, and Bette Davis was not underrated. In fact, pretty much everyone but whoever wrote this garbage knows her name is not Midler.

insi10

You don’t seem anywhere near stupid, so you must have started out shaming Einstein. Stupid is the writer of the commentary. Or Dumb and Dumberer.

RedWiggler

Movies, like music are subjective. Metropolis was unique but doesn’t impress me. Unforgiven has one of the all time great endings but the rest is slow. Bonnie & Clyde has it’s moments but eh. Casablanca is great. The Graduate is not my type of movie. Ace V is alright. The Wizard of Oz is great. A Hall, I’m not a Woody Allen fan. Godfather II is very good most of the time. Speed Racer, no I don’t like it. All About Eve, again not my type. Apocalypse Now is very good. Just my opinion, others will disagree.

dicksicario

The greatest Western ever made….. Sergio Leone’s ” Once Upon a Time in the West ”
Was also panned. the gunfight scene toward the end of the film is the greatest ever
filmed and takes as much time to play out as most movies !

Spencer Keimon

I think writer should switch to fiction.

Bob Rosswaag

Good God – Bette MIDLER?! Just to be a picky grammarian, “it’s” is used incorrectly throughout this piece. “Its” is already possessive: it doesn’t take an apostrophe. Several of the so-called unpopular films (like “Unforgiven” and All About Eve”) won Best Picture Oscars – how critically “unpopular” could they have been? Who writes this stuff?

Michael R. Wilson

Who in the world wrote this idiotic article? Very obvious that they know next to nothing about the history of cinema. And if you’re going to cherry-pick bad reviews that some of these may have received, it would be appropriate to give credit to authors so that the sources of these inane comments would be known. I hope the writer of this article wasn’t paid for this B.S?

rainman199

The author is an idiot and has no business writing about movies. His grasp of history and movies is appallingly lacking. If this were submitted as a paper in a film history class he would receive an “F”. Okay maybe a “D” with the emphasis that is placed on the idea that effort is more important than competence in today’s college environment.

M Carroll

When “Star Wars” first came out, most critics dismissed it as frivolous and boring. But after a tremendous box office response, those same critics called it one of the best science fiction movies ever.

Evolve or Extinction

Metropolis = stupid humans destroy the robotics that would free them from dangerous and labor intensive work.
Sure, now we are concerned that robotics will eliminate ALL human jobs,
3D printers can eliminate almost all basic manufacturing, and
no one wants to see the rise of the machines as they slaughter humans by the billions – drone warfare is just a start. Soon whole armies will be nothing but tens of thousands of robots swarming over cities slaughtering each and every living man woman and child.
Win world wars in days, no need to fight ISIL if 800,000 microbots the size of a football can simply swarm over entire countries and kill every human they see – or only kill every human holding an AK47… software is adaptive.
Metropolis was a stupid movie, instead of constant fighting and division,
sitting down and discussing the best uses for Robotics would have
made a happy ending for everyone.

http://Handsome.com kG

I am old enough to remember Unforgiven when it came out and not a single critic panned the movie. The movie was hailed as a masterpiece that it was. I was in high school and even I realized then that I was watching an amazing film by a man who had defined the genere. And he redefined it with Unforgiven!

http://Handsome.com kG

Bonnie and Clyde was panned by the establishment critics of the big papers but it grew in stature as it became more and more successful. Either Pauline Keale or Stanely Kaufman first called it a masterpiece but the other critics hated it for its excessive viold cd.

Ishmael

Save for a few scenes, “Apocalypse Now” still sucks. The director’s cut is even worse.

Anonymous By Force

Obviously a troll article designed for clicks.

Mickey Logan

What idiocy. Unforgiven was a huge hit the moment it came out.

333sturm

Horrible article. As others have pointed out, these movies all got generally good reviews. The author finds a negative review and tries to argue that the film was poorly received.

ChargerGrant

You can always find ONE critic that hates a movie, even a classic. How do I get the last 3 minutes of my life back?

Pookiefreak

UNFORGIVEN not popular
with the critics? It was the critics that led it to Oscar glory:

Boston Society of Film
Critics Awards 1992

Won
BSFC Award
Best Picture
Best Supporting Actor-Gene
Hackman
Best Cinematography-Jack
N. Green

Chicago Film Critics
Association Awards 1993
Nominated
CFCA Award
Best Supporting Actor-Gene
Hackman
Best Actor-Clint Eastwood
Best Picture-Clint
Eastwood
Best Director-Clint
Eastwood
Best Screenplay-David Webb
Peoples

Kansas City Film Critics
Circle Awards 1992
Won
KCFCC Award
Best Film
Tied with The Player
(1992).
Best Supporting Actor-Gene
Hackman
Best Director-Clint
Eastwood

London Critics Circle Film
Awards 1993
Won
ALFS Award
Film of the Year

Los Angeles Film Critics
Association Awards 1992
Won
LAFCA Award
Best Picture
Best Actor-Clint Eastwood
Best Supporting Actor-Gene
Hackman
Best Director-Clint
Eastwood
Best Screenplay-David Webb
Peoples
2nd place
LAFCA Award
Best Cinematography-Jack
N. Green

National Society of Film
Critics Awards, USA 1993
Won
NSFC Award
Best Film
Best Supporting Actor-Gene
Hackman
Best Director-Clint
Eastwood
Best Screenplay-David Webb
Peoples
2nd place
NSFC Award
Best Actor-Clint Eastwood
3rd place
NSFC Award
Best Cinematography-Jack
N. Green

New York Film Critics
Circle Awards 1992
Won
NYFCC Award
Best Supporting Actor-Gene
Hackman
2nd place
NYFCC Award
Best Film
Best Director-Clint
Eastwood
3rd place
NYFCC Award
Best Screenplay-David Webb
Peoples

And, ANNIE HALL not being a hit with critics as well? It was quite the
opposite:

National Board of Review,
USA 1977
Won
NBR Award
Best Supporting
Actress-Diane Keaton
One of Year’s Top Ten Films

National Society of Film
Critics Awards, USA 1977
Won
NSFC Award
Best Film
Best Actress-Diane Keaton
Best Screenplay-Woody
Allen and Marshall Brickman
3rd place
NSFC Award
Best Director- Woody Allen

New York Film Critics
Circle Awards 1977
Won
NYFCC Award
Best Film
Best Director-Woody Allen
Best Actress-Diane Keaton

Best Screenplay-Woody
Allen and Marshall Brickman

Los Angeles Film Critics
Association Awards 1977
Won
LAFCA Award
Best Screenplay-Woody
Allen and Marshall and Brickman

Kansas City Film Critics
Circle Awards 1977
Won
KCFCC Award
Best Film
Best Actress-Diane Keaton
Best Director- Woody Allen

In 1977, the LA Film Critics Association was only in its second year. Up to
that point, the main Critic Award Organizations were the National Board of
Review, the New York Film Critics Circle, and the National Society of Film Critics.

Perhaps the next time you run an article like this, you should take the time to do a bit more homework on the films you list and how critics, by the end of a film’s release year, ultimately assessed them.

steve981cr

Please do some research before writing. Casablanca won best picture of the year. Hardly what I would call being panned by critics. And the the author’s opening comment “Alright, so this dramatic tale of love lost isn’t to everyone’s taste,…” who could possibly not like Casablanca? And if there is someone then I’d like to know what they do like as I’m sure it would be amusing.

insi10

This article is basically a lie. An utter lie. Look them up on RT. 90% of the critics surveyed LOVED Bonnie and Clyde. 8.2 out of 10 average. Unforgiven scored with “only” 95% of critics.

insi10

Casablanca: “Critics Consensus:
An undisputed masterpiece and perhaps Hollywood’s quintessential statement on love and romance, ” 97% of critics loved it.

Who is this idiot writer?

insi10

The critics’ consensus is that this is the most ignorant article ever written about movies. It’s the Attack of the Killer Tomatoes of commentaries. If it were a movie, it would be “The Cook, The Thief, His Wife, and Her Lover,” with the volume turned up even more when that “singer” screeches.

Askelon

So,,,Writer is obviously not old enough to have personal knowledge of most of these movies at release. As a result, Writer is having to depend upon research, a talent upon which the Writer fails in numerous ways. ” Bette Midler-Bette Davis,,,well, one’s old ,one’s dead, and both were before my time. How am I suppose to keep them straight ? Speed >Rader< and Ace Ventura are of course classics of my generation. How could anyone argue with that ! Everybody in my 3rd grade class loved them. And just because some of these old movies garnered multiple Oscar nominations and wins during their year of release doesn't negate MY theory that they were panned at that time."…I always feel dirty when I have to dip thoughts out of a dipsh#ts mind. Comments by Oliver below said it much better than I just did.

StevenBall

The critics are often wrong but fortunately the people ultimate decide which movie stands the test of time.

worrierking

“Speed Racer”, “Ace Ventura”, ? Haven’t seen them, but don’t think they should be on any list with “Casablanca” or “Apocalypse Now”. I could be wrong

weirdpeter

Another example of how making one itsy bitsy error in your article gets you sent to the woodshed. The dogs were waiting to pounce and you opened the door to the kennel,

granny

Bette Midler ? Who wrote this? Is proof reading against your religion or something? I am embarrassed for this writer and think you should try photography instead.

6. Ace Ventura: Pet Detective

ADVERTISEMENT

PEOPLE ALSO READ

ADVERTISEMENT

Popular

ADVERTISEMENT

WHAT OTHERS ARE READING